Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:45:04PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: Much cleaner, sent v4 with your suggestions. > Why call __alloc_pages_nodemask at all if you want to skip the node > handling? Punt to alloc_pages() - __alloc_pages_nodemask ignored GFP_DMA32 on older kernels, so the interface should remain functional. - There are others callers of alloc_pages(GFP_DMA) that can suffer from the same problem. - Mirrors mempolicy behaviour. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:45:04PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: snip Much cleaner, sent v4 with your suggestions. Why call __alloc_pages_nodemask at all if you want to skip the node handling? Punt to alloc_pages() - __alloc_pages_nodemask ignored GFP_DMA32 on older kernels, so the interface should remain functional. - There are others callers of alloc_pages(GFP_DMA) that can suffer from the same problem. - Mirrors mempolicy behaviour. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3)
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 5dba293..dfea3dc 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -2698,6 +2698,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int > order, > unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie; > int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET|ALLOC_FAIR; > struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; > + nodemask_t *cpuset_mems_allowed = _current_mems_allowed; Why do you need this one? > gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask; > > @@ -2726,9 +2727,14 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int > order, > retry_cpuset: > cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin(); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone) > + cpuset_mems_allowed = NULL; nodemask = _states[N_ONLINE]; > +#endif > + > /* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */ > first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx, > - nodemask ? : _current_mems_allowed, > + nodemask ? : cpuset_mems_allowed, Skip this? > _zone); > if (!preferred_zone) > goto out; > Why call __alloc_pages_nodemask at all if you want to skip the node handling? Punt to alloc_pages() -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3)
Zone specific allocations, such as GFP_DMA32, should not be restricted to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand might be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list. Necessary for the following usecase: - driver which requires zone specific memory (such as KVM, which requires root pagetable at paddr < 4GB). - user wants to limit allocations of application to nodeX, and nodeX has no memory < 4GB. Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644 --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs) * variable 'wait' is not set, and the bit ALLOC_CPUSET is not set * in alloc_flags. That logic and the checks below have the combined * affect that: + * gfp_zone(mask) < policy_zone - any node ok * in_interrupt - any node ok (current task context irrelevant) * GFP_ATOMIC - any node ok * TIF_MEMDIE - any node ok @@ -2392,6 +2393,10 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask) if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE)) return 1; +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone) + return 1; +#endif might_sleep_if(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_HARDWALL)); if (node_isset(node, current->mems_allowed)) return 1; diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5dba293..dfea3dc 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2698,6 +2698,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie; int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET|ALLOC_FAIR; struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; + nodemask_t *cpuset_mems_allowed = _current_mems_allowed; gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask; @@ -2726,9 +2727,14 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, retry_cpuset: cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin(); +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone) + cpuset_mems_allowed = NULL; +#endif + /* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */ first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx, - nodemask ? : _current_mems_allowed, + nodemask ? : cpuset_mems_allowed, _zone); if (!preferred_zone) goto out; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3)
Zone specific allocations, such as GFP_DMA32, should not be restricted to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand might be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list. Necessary for the following usecase: - driver which requires zone specific memory (such as KVM, which requires root pagetable at paddr 4GB). - user wants to limit allocations of application to nodeX, and nodeX has no memory 4GB. Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644 --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs) * variable 'wait' is not set, and the bit ALLOC_CPUSET is not set * in alloc_flags. That logic and the checks below have the combined * affect that: + * gfp_zone(mask) policy_zone - any node ok * in_interrupt - any node ok (current task context irrelevant) * GFP_ATOMIC - any node ok * TIF_MEMDIE - any node ok @@ -2392,6 +2393,10 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask) if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask __GFP_THISNODE)) return 1; +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) policy_zone) + return 1; +#endif might_sleep_if(!(gfp_mask __GFP_HARDWALL)); if (node_isset(node, current-mems_allowed)) return 1; diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5dba293..dfea3dc 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2698,6 +2698,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie; int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET|ALLOC_FAIR; struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; + nodemask_t *cpuset_mems_allowed = cpuset_current_mems_allowed; gfp_mask = gfp_allowed_mask; @@ -2726,9 +2727,14 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, retry_cpuset: cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin(); +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) policy_zone) + cpuset_mems_allowed = NULL; +#endif + /* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */ first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx, - nodemask ? : cpuset_current_mems_allowed, + nodemask ? : cpuset_mems_allowed, preferred_zone); if (!preferred_zone) goto out; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3)
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5dba293..dfea3dc 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2698,6 +2698,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie; int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET|ALLOC_FAIR; struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; + nodemask_t *cpuset_mems_allowed = cpuset_current_mems_allowed; Why do you need this one? gfp_mask = gfp_allowed_mask; @@ -2726,9 +2727,14 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, retry_cpuset: cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin(); +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) policy_zone) + cpuset_mems_allowed = NULL; nodemask = node_states[N_ONLINE]; +#endif + /* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */ first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx, - nodemask ? : cpuset_current_mems_allowed, + nodemask ? : cpuset_mems_allowed, Skip this? preferred_zone); if (!preferred_zone) goto out; Why call __alloc_pages_nodemask at all if you want to skip the node handling? Punt to alloc_pages() -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/