On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:50:56AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > When I said that my point about mempolicies needs more thought, I wasn't
> > expecting that there would be no discussion -- at least _something_ that
> > would say why we don't car
On Thu, 29 May 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
> When I said that my point about mempolicies needs more thought, I wasn't
> expecting that there would be no discussion -- at least _something_ that
> would say why we don't care about the mempolicy case.
Lets get Andi involved here too.
> The motivati
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:54:00PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> > index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> > @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset
>
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct
> cpuset *cs)
> * variable 'wait' is not se
Zone specific allocations, such as GFP_DMA32, should not be restricted
to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand
might be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list.
Necessary for the following usecase:
- driver which requires zone specific memory (such
5 matches
Mail list logo
