Re: [PATCH] percpu: add a schedule point in pcpu_balance_workfn()

2018-02-23 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:12:42AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet 
> 
> When a large BPF percpu map is destroyed, I have seen
> pcpu_balance_workfn() holding cpu for hundreds of milliseconds.
> 
> On KASAN config and 112 hyperthreads, average time to destroy a chunk
> is ~4 ms.
> 
> [ 2489.841376] destroy chunk 1 in 4148689 ns
> ...
> [ 2490.093428] destroy chunk 32 in 4072718 ns
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 

Applied to percpu/for-4.16-fixes.

Thank, Eric.

-- 
tejun


[PATCH] percpu: add a schedule point in pcpu_balance_workfn()

2018-02-23 Thread Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet 

When a large BPF percpu map is destroyed, I have seen
pcpu_balance_workfn() holding cpu for hundreds of milliseconds.

On KASAN config and 112 hyperthreads, average time to destroy a chunk
is ~4 ms.

[ 2489.841376] destroy chunk 1 in 4148689 ns
...
[ 2490.093428] destroy chunk 32 in 4072718 ns

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
---
 mm/percpu.c |1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 
50e7fdf84055151d8c7e8bb220f7a73e96b7f3e4..d40dfb597ffce2656220257f0227219ab917135b
 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1600,6 +1600,7 @@ static void pcpu_balance_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
}
pcpu_destroy_chunk(chunk);
+   cond_resched();
}
 
/*