Hi Gwendal,
Thank you for your patch.
On 30/6/20 9:52, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> EC is using 32 bit timestamps (us), and before converting it to 64bit
> they were not casted, so it would overflow every 4s.
> Regular overflow every ~70 minutes was not taken into acoun either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou
Applied for 5.9 with a slightly modified subject, platform/chrome:
cros_ec_sensorhub: ...
> ---
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
> b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
> index 23960f3acc0b1..641d91088cee2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
> @@ -465,9 +465,7 @@ cros_ec_sensor_ring_process_event(struct
> cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub,
>* Disable filtering since we might add more jitter
>* if b is in a random point in time.
>*/
> - new_timestamp = fifo_timestamp -
> - fifo_info->timestamp * 1000 +
> - in->timestamp * 1000;
> + new_timestamp = c - b * 1000 + a * 1000;
> /*
>* The timestamp can be stale if we had to use the fifo
>* info timestamp.
>
