Sam Ravnborg writes:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> For several years, the pattern "foo$" has effectively been treated as
>> equivalent to "foo" due to a bug in the (misnamed) helper
>> number_prefix(). This hasn't been observed to cause any problems, so
>>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> For several years, the pattern "foo$" has effectively been treated as
> equivalent to "foo" due to a bug in the (misnamed) helper
> number_prefix(). This hasn't been observed to cause any problems, so
> remove the broken $
For several years, the pattern "foo$" has effectively been treated as
equivalent to "foo" due to a bug in the (misnamed) helper
number_prefix(). This hasn't been observed to cause any problems, so
remove the broken $ functionality and change all foo$ patterns to foo.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus
For several years, the pattern foo$ has effectively been treated as
equivalent to foo due to a bug in the (misnamed) helper
number_prefix(). This hasn't been observed to cause any problems, so
remove the broken $ functionality and change all foo$ patterns to foo.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
For several years, the pattern foo$ has effectively been treated as
equivalent to foo due to a bug in the (misnamed) helper
number_prefix(). This hasn't been observed to cause any problems, so
remove the broken $ functionality
Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org writes:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
For several years, the pattern foo$ has effectively been treated as
equivalent to foo due to a bug in the (misnamed) helper
number_prefix(). This hasn't been observed to cause any problems,
6 matches
Mail list logo
