On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> One minor question regarding your patch though: it hasn't got a
> destroy_work_on_stack(). Isn't one needed because of
> INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() -> __INIT_WORK() -> __init_work() ->
> debug_object_init_on_stack() ?
> At least work_o
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:17:58PM +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> This new warning
>>
>> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
>> the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
>> turning off the locking correctness validator.
>> CPU: 0 PID: 82 Comm: kworker/
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:17:58PM +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> This new warning
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 PID: 82 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc6+ #360
>
This new warning
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 0 PID: 82 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc6+ #360
Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E6540/0725FP, BIOS A10 06/26/2014
Workq
4 matches
Mail list logo