Size of kmalloc() in vc_do_resize() is controlled by user.
Too large kmalloc() size triggers WARNING message on console.
Put a reasonable upper bound on terminal size to prevent WARNINGs.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com>
CC: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gno...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzkal...@googlegroups.com

---

I've sent a patch that adds __GFP_NOWARN to the kmalloc() a while ago:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller/9xTEI2ghFwA/fTgt7oonAAAJ
But David and One Thousand Gnomes suggested that we should put
a reasonable upper bound rather than blindly trying kmalloc().
"I think we can go down to something like cols * lines < 4MB
with complete safety".

Example WARNING:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7642 at mm/page_alloc.c:2999
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7d2/0x1760()
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 PID: 7642 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.4.0+ #276
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 00000000ffffffff ffff88006d24f610 ffffffff82999e2d 0000000000000000
 ffff880060d9af80 ffffffff86475560 ffff88006d24f650 ffffffff81352089
 ffffffff816721e2 ffffffff86475560 0000000000000bb7 00000000024240c0
Call Trace:
 [<     inline     >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15
 [<ffffffff82999e2d>] dump_stack+0x6f/0xa2 lib/dump_stack.c:50
 [<ffffffff81352089>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:482
 [<ffffffff813522b9>] warn_slowpath_null+0x29/0x30 kernel/panic.c:515
 [<     inline     >] __alloc_pages_slowpath mm/page_alloc.c:2999
 [<ffffffff816721e2>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7d2/0x1760 mm/page_alloc.c:3253
 [<ffffffff8174a799>] alloc_pages_current+0xe9/0x450 mm/mempolicy.c:2090
 [<     inline     >] alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:459
 [<ffffffff8166df66>] alloc_kmem_pages+0x16/0x100 mm/page_alloc.c:3433
 [<ffffffff816c698f>] kmalloc_order+0x1f/0x80 mm/slab_common.c:1008
 [<ffffffff816c6a0f>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x1f/0x140 mm/slab_common.c:1019
 [<     inline     >] kmalloc_large include/linux/slab.h:395
 [<ffffffff8175b624>] __kmalloc+0x2f4/0x340 mm/slub.c:3557
 [<     inline     >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:468
 [<ffffffff82d47800>] vc_do_resize+0x2c0/0x1140 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:874
 [<ffffffff82d4878a>] vt_resize+0xaa/0xe0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:993
 [<     inline     >] tiocswinsz drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2357
 [<ffffffff82cf22b3>] tty_ioctl+0x1083/0x2160 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2869
 [<     inline     >] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:43
 [<ffffffff817efdac>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x18c/0xfb0 fs/ioctl.c:674
 [<     inline     >] SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:689
 [<ffffffff817f0c5f>] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:680
---
 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
index 06fb39c..652abc1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
@@ -870,6 +870,8 @@ static int vc_do_resize(struct tty_struct *tty, struct 
vc_data *vc,
        if (new_cols == vc->vc_cols && new_rows == vc->vc_rows)
                return 0;
 
+       if (new_screen_size > (4 << 20))
+               return -EINVAL;
        newscreen = kmalloc(new_screen_size, GFP_USER);
        if (!newscreen)
                return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

Reply via email to