On 2015/3/13 0:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, March 12, 2015 09:41:21 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/3/12 9:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
>> Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
>>
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 09:41:21 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/3/12 9:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
> Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
>
> /*
> * We would
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 09:41:21 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/3/12 9:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
/*
* We would love to complain here if
On 2015/3/13 0:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 09:41:21 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/3/12 9:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
/*
On 2015/3/12 9:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
/*
* We would love to complain here if pci_dev->is_enabled is set,
that
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * We would love to complain here if pci_dev->is_enabled is set,
> >> that
> >> * the driver should have called
>> Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
>>
>> /*
>> * We would love to complain here if pci_dev->is_enabled is set, that
>> * the driver should have called pci_disable_device(), but the
>> * unfortunate fact is there are too many
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:47:30 AM Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 20:51 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:49 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > > On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > The IRQ resource for a device is established when
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 20:51 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:49 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
> > > is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt ==
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 20:51 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:49 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:47:30 AM Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 20:51 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:49 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
/*
* We would love to complain here if pci_dev-is_enabled is set, that
* the driver should have called pci_disable_device(), but the
* unfortunate fact is there are too many odd BIOS and
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
/*
* We would love to complain here if pci_dev-is_enabled is set,
that
* the driver should have called pci_disable_device(), but
On 2015/3/12 9:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:04:42 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
Unfortunately there's a long standing comment in pci_device_remove():
/*
* We would love to complain here if pci_dev-is_enabled is set,
that
* the driver should
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:49 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
> > is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
> > commit b4b55cda5874 ("x86/PCI: Refine the way to
On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
> is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
> commit b4b55cda5874 ("x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ
> resources") this same IRQ resource is released
The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
commit b4b55cda5874 ("x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ
resources") this same IRQ resource is released when the driver is
unbound from the device,
The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
commit b4b55cda5874 (x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ
resources) this same IRQ resource is released when the driver is
unbound from the device,
On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
commit b4b55cda5874 (x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ
resources) this same IRQ resource is released when
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:49 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/3/6 5:06, Alex Williamson wrote:
The IRQ resource for a device is established when pci_enabled_device()
is called on a fully disabled device (ie. enable_cnt == 0). With
commit b4b55cda5874 (x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI
20 matches
Mail list logo
