* Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct, at 07:47:38AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > Some time ago, we brought our UV BIOS callback code up to speed with the
> > new EFI memory mapping scheme, in commit:
> >
> > d1be84a232e3 ("x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use
> > efi_call_virt_pointer()")
>
On Tue, 18 Oct, at 07:47:38AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Some time ago, we brought our UV BIOS callback code up to speed with the
> new EFI memory mapping scheme, in commit:
>
> d1be84a232e3 ("x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use
> efi_call_virt_pointer()")
>
> By leveraging some changes that I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:32:00PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> Could you please invert the conditional? I had to read it 3 times to
> make sure it was correct given the comment that precedes it. E.g. this
> is preferable,
>
> if (efi_enabled(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP))
> ret = efi_call((
Some time ago, we brought our UV BIOS callback code up to speed with the
new EFI memory mapping scheme, in commit:
d1be84a232e3 ("x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use
efi_call_virt_pointer()")
By leveraging some changes that I made to a few of the EFI runtime
callback mechanisms, in commit:
4 matches
Mail list logo