On Monday, October 17, 2016 1:28:01 PM CEST Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 01:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Using an open-coded semaphore as a replacement is probably just
> > the last resort that we can consider once we are down to the
> > last handful of users. I haven't looked at drive
On 10/17/2016 01:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Using an open-coded semaphore as a replacement is probably just
the last resort that we can consider once we are down to the
last handful of users. I haven't looked at drivers/infiniband/
yet for this, but I believe that drivers/acpi/ is a case for
whi
On Monday, October 17, 2016 9:57:34 AM CEST Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 09:30 AM, Binoy Jayan wrote:
> > These are a set of patches which removes semaphores from infiniband.
> > These are part of a bigger effort to eliminate all semaphores from the
> > linux kernel.
>
> Hello Binoy,
>
On 10/17/2016 09:30 AM, Binoy Jayan wrote:
These are a set of patches which removes semaphores from infiniband.
These are part of a bigger effort to eliminate all semaphores from the
linux kernel.
Hello Binoy,
Why do you think it would be a good idea to eliminate all semaphores
from the Linux
Hi,
These are a set of patches which removes semaphores from infiniband.
These are part of a bigger effort to eliminate all semaphores from the
linux kernel.
NB: A few semaphores which are counting ones are replaced with an open-coded
implementation by introducing a new type in 'include/rdma/ib_s
5 matches
Mail list logo