On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
On 2018/4/10 23:01, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/10/2018 10:31 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/10 22:27, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite
On 2018/4/10 23:01, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/10/2018 10:31 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/10 22:27, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite
On 04/10/2018 10:31 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018/4/10 22:27, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>>> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
>>> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>>>
>>> Despite never getting called from
On 04/10/2018 10:31 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018/4/10 22:27, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>>> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
>>> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>>>
>>> Despite never getting called from
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced
12 matches
Mail list logo
