Hi,
On 08-08-17 10:24, Liam Breck wrote:
Hallo Hans :-)
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is
done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is
controlled through
Hi,
On 08-08-17 10:24, Liam Breck wrote:
Hallo Hans :-)
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is
done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is
controlled through another (charger) IC.
It
Hallo Hans :-)
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is
> done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is
> controlled through another (charger) IC.
>
> It has been decided
Hallo Hans :-)
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is
> done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is
> controlled through another (charger) IC.
>
> It has been decided to model this by
On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is
done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is
controlled through another (charger) IC.
It has been decided to model this by modelling the external Type-C
power brick (adapter/charger) as a power-supply class
On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is
done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is
controlled through another (charger) IC.
It has been decided to model this by modelling the external Type-C
power brick (adapter/charger) as a power-supply class
6 matches
Mail list logo