Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: remove pointless checks in vmalloc_fault

2018-03-14 Thread Kani, Toshi
On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 20:56 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 20:27 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > 
> > > > vmalloc_fault() sets user's pgd or p4d from the kernel page table.
> > > > Once it's set, all tables underneath are identical. There is no point
> > > > of following the same page table with two separate pointers and makes
> > > > sure they see the same with BUG().
> > > > 
> > > > Remove the pointless checks in vmalloc_fault(). Also rename the kernel
> > > > pgd/p4d pointers to pgd_k/p4d_k so that their names are consistent in
> > > > the file.
> > > 
> > > I have no idea to which branch this might apply. The first patch applies
> > > cleanly on linus head, but this one fails in hunk #2 on everything I
> > > tried. Can you please check?
> > 
> > Sorry for the trouble. The patches are based on linus head. I just tried
> > and they applied clean to me... 
> 
> Hmm. Looks like I tried on the wrong branch. Nevertheless, 1/2 is queued in
> urgent, but 2/2 will go through tip/x86/mm which already has changes in
> that area causing the patch to fail. I just merged x86/urgent into x86/mm
> and pushed it out. Can you please rebase 2/2 on top of that bracnh and
> resend ?

Yes, I will merge up 2/2 and resend.

Thanks,
-Toshi


Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: remove pointless checks in vmalloc_fault

2018-03-14 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 20:27 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > 
> > > vmalloc_fault() sets user's pgd or p4d from the kernel page table.
> > > Once it's set, all tables underneath are identical. There is no point
> > > of following the same page table with two separate pointers and makes
> > > sure they see the same with BUG().
> > > 
> > > Remove the pointless checks in vmalloc_fault(). Also rename the kernel
> > > pgd/p4d pointers to pgd_k/p4d_k so that their names are consistent in
> > > the file.
> > 
> > I have no idea to which branch this might apply. The first patch applies
> > cleanly on linus head, but this one fails in hunk #2 on everything I
> > tried. Can you please check?
> 
> Sorry for the trouble. The patches are based on linus head. I just tried
> and they applied clean to me... 

Hmm. Looks like I tried on the wrong branch. Nevertheless, 1/2 is queued in
urgent, but 2/2 will go through tip/x86/mm which already has changes in
that area causing the patch to fail. I just merged x86/urgent into x86/mm
and pushed it out. Can you please rebase 2/2 on top of that bracnh and
resend ?

Thanks,

tglx


Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: remove pointless checks in vmalloc_fault

2018-03-14 Thread Kani, Toshi
On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 20:27 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Toshi Kani wrote:
> 
> > vmalloc_fault() sets user's pgd or p4d from the kernel page table.
> > Once it's set, all tables underneath are identical. There is no point
> > of following the same page table with two separate pointers and makes
> > sure they see the same with BUG().
> > 
> > Remove the pointless checks in vmalloc_fault(). Also rename the kernel
> > pgd/p4d pointers to pgd_k/p4d_k so that their names are consistent in
> > the file.
> 
> I have no idea to which branch this might apply. The first patch applies
> cleanly on linus head, but this one fails in hunk #2 on everything I
> tried. Can you please check?

Sorry for the trouble. The patches are based on linus head. I just tried
and they applied clean to me... 

Thanks,
-Toshi


Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: remove pointless checks in vmalloc_fault

2018-03-14 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Toshi Kani wrote:

> vmalloc_fault() sets user's pgd or p4d from the kernel page table.
> Once it's set, all tables underneath are identical. There is no point
> of following the same page table with two separate pointers and makes
> sure they see the same with BUG().
> 
> Remove the pointless checks in vmalloc_fault(). Also rename the kernel
> pgd/p4d pointers to pgd_k/p4d_k so that their names are consistent in
> the file.

I have no idea to which branch this might apply. The first patch applies
cleanly on linus head, but this one fails in hunk #2 on everything I
tried. Can you please check?

Thanks,

tglx




[PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: remove pointless checks in vmalloc_fault

2018-03-13 Thread Toshi Kani
vmalloc_fault() sets user's pgd or p4d from the kernel page table.
Once it's set, all tables underneath are identical. There is no point
of following the same page table with two separate pointers and makes
sure they see the same with BUG().

Remove the pointless checks in vmalloc_fault(). Also rename the kernel
pgd/p4d pointers to pgd_k/p4d_k so that their names are consistent in
the file.

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski 
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
Cc: Borislav Petkov 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Cc: Gratian Crisan 
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c |   56 +++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 25a30b5d6582..e7bc79853538 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -417,11 +417,11 @@ void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
  */
 static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
 {
-   pgd_t *pgd, *pgd_ref;
-   p4d_t *p4d, *p4d_ref;
-   pud_t *pud, *pud_ref;
-   pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_ref;
-   pte_t *pte, *pte_ref;
+   pgd_t *pgd, *pgd_k;
+   p4d_t *p4d, *p4d_k;
+   pud_t *pud;
+   pmd_t *pmd;
+   pte_t *pte;
 
/* Make sure we are in vmalloc area: */
if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
@@ -435,73 +435,51 @@ static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
 * case just flush:
 */
pgd = (pgd_t *)__va(read_cr3_pa()) + pgd_index(address);
-   pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address);
-   if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref))
+   pgd_k = pgd_offset_k(address);
+   if (pgd_none(*pgd_k))
return -1;
 
if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4) {
if (pgd_none(*pgd)) {
-   set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref);
+   set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_k);
arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
} else {
-   BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd) != 
pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_ref));
+   BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd) != pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_k));
}
}
 
/* With 4-level paging, copying happens on the p4d level. */
p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, address);
-   p4d_ref = p4d_offset(pgd_ref, address);
-   if (p4d_none(*p4d_ref))
+   p4d_k = p4d_offset(pgd_k, address);
+   if (p4d_none(*p4d_k))
return -1;
 
if (p4d_none(*p4d) && CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 4) {
-   set_p4d(p4d, *p4d_ref);
+   set_p4d(p4d, *p4d_k);
arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
} else {
-   BUG_ON(p4d_pfn(*p4d) != p4d_pfn(*p4d_ref));
+   BUG_ON(p4d_pfn(*p4d) != p4d_pfn(*p4d_k));
}
 
-   /*
-* Below here mismatches are bugs because these lower tables
-* are shared:
-*/
BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS < 4);
 
pud = pud_offset(p4d, address);
-   pud_ref = pud_offset(p4d_ref, address);
-   if (pud_none(*pud_ref))
+   if (pud_none(*pud))
return -1;
 
-   if (pud_none(*pud) || pud_pfn(*pud) != pud_pfn(*pud_ref))
-   BUG();
-
if (pud_large(*pud))
return 0;
 
pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
-   pmd_ref = pmd_offset(pud_ref, address);
-   if (pmd_none(*pmd_ref))
+   if (pmd_none(*pmd))
return -1;
 
-   if (pmd_none(*pmd) || pmd_pfn(*pmd) != pmd_pfn(*pmd_ref))
-   BUG();
-
if (pmd_large(*pmd))
return 0;
 
-   pte_ref = pte_offset_kernel(pmd_ref, address);
-   if (!pte_present(*pte_ref))
-   return -1;
-
pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
-
-   /*
-* Don't use pte_page here, because the mappings can point
-* outside mem_map, and the NUMA hash lookup cannot handle
-* that:
-*/
-   if (!pte_present(*pte) || pte_pfn(*pte) != pte_pfn(*pte_ref))
-   BUG();
+   if (!pte_present(*pte))
+   return -1;
 
return 0;
 }