[PATCH 4.12 011/106] iwlwifi: dvm: prevent an out of bounds access

2017-08-09 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

--

From: Emmanuel Grumbach 

commit 0b0f934e92a8eaed2e6c48a50eae6f84661f74f3 upstream.

iwlagn_check_ratid_empty takes the tid as a parameter, but
it doesn't check that it is not IWL_TID_NON_QOS.
Since IWL_TID_NON_QOS = 8 and iwl_priv::tid_data is an array
with 8 entries, accessing iwl_priv::tid_data[IWL_TID_NON_QOS]
is a bad idea.
This happened in iwlagn_rx_reply_tx. Since
iwlagn_check_ratid_empty is relevant only to check whether
we can open A-MPDU, this flow is irrelevant if tid is
IWL_TID_NON_QOS. Call iwlagn_check_ratid_empty only inside
the
if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS)

a few lines earlier in the function.

Reported-by: Seraphime Kirkovski 
Tested-by: Seraphime Kirkovski 
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach 
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 

---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
@@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv
next_reclaimed;
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
  next_reclaimed);
+   iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
}
 
iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, );
 
-   iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
freed = 0;
 
/* process frames */




[PATCH 4.12 011/106] iwlwifi: dvm: prevent an out of bounds access

2017-08-09 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

--

From: Emmanuel Grumbach 

commit 0b0f934e92a8eaed2e6c48a50eae6f84661f74f3 upstream.

iwlagn_check_ratid_empty takes the tid as a parameter, but
it doesn't check that it is not IWL_TID_NON_QOS.
Since IWL_TID_NON_QOS = 8 and iwl_priv::tid_data is an array
with 8 entries, accessing iwl_priv::tid_data[IWL_TID_NON_QOS]
is a bad idea.
This happened in iwlagn_rx_reply_tx. Since
iwlagn_check_ratid_empty is relevant only to check whether
we can open A-MPDU, this flow is irrelevant if tid is
IWL_TID_NON_QOS. Call iwlagn_check_ratid_empty only inside
the
if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS)

a few lines earlier in the function.

Reported-by: Seraphime Kirkovski 
Tested-by: Seraphime Kirkovski 
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach 
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 

---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
@@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv
next_reclaimed;
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
  next_reclaimed);
+   iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
}
 
iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, );
 
-   iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
freed = 0;
 
/* process frames */