4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> [ Upstream commit d94708a553022bf012fa95af10532a134eeb5a52 ] Commit de77ecd4ef02 ("bonding: improve link-status update in mii-monitoring") moves link status commitment into bond_mii_monitor(), but it still relies on the return value of bond_miimon_inspect() as the hint. We need to return non-zero as long as we propose a link status change. Fixes: de77ecd4ef02 ("bonding: improve link-status update in mii-monitoring") Reported-by: Benjamin Gilbert <benjamin.gilb...@coreos.com> Tested-by: Benjamin Gilbert <benjamin.gilb...@coreos.com> Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -2047,6 +2047,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bo continue; bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_FAIL); + commit++; slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay; if (slave->delay) { netdev_info(bond->dev, "link status down for %sinterface %s, disabling it in %d ms\n", @@ -2085,6 +2086,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bo continue; bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_BACK); + commit++; slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; if (slave->delay) {