4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
commit b3a0066005821acdc0cdb092cb72587182ab583f upstream.
fsnotify_add_mark_locked() can fail but we do not check its return
value. This didn't matter before commit 9dd813c15b2c "fsnotify: Move
mark list head from object into dedicated structure" as none of possible
failures could happen for dnotify but after that commit -ENOMEM can be
returned. Handle this error properly in fcntl_dirnotify() as
otherwise we just hit BUG_ON(dn_mark->dn) in dnotify_free_mark().
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzkaller
Fixes: 9dd813c15b2c101168808d4f5941a29985758973
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
@@ -319,7 +319,11 @@ int fcntl_dirnotify(int fd, struct file
dn_mark = container_of(fsn_mark, struct dnotify_mark, fsn_mark);
spin_lock(&fsn_mark->lock);
} else {
- fsnotify_add_mark_locked(new_fsn_mark, inode, NULL, 0);
+ error = fsnotify_add_mark_locked(new_fsn_mark, inode, NULL, 0);
+ if (error) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dnotify_group->mark_mutex);
+ goto out_err;
+ }
spin_lock(&new_fsn_mark->lock);
fsn_mark = new_fsn_mark;
dn_mark = new_dn_mark;
@@ -345,6 +349,7 @@ int fcntl_dirnotify(int fd, struct file
*/
if (dn_mark == new_dn_mark)
destroy = 1;
+ error = 0;
goto out;
}
