4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
commit 6a53b7593233ab9e4f96873ebacc0f653a55c3e1 upstream.
syzbot reported a kernel warning in xfrm_state_fini(), which
indicates that we have entries left in the list
net->xfrm.state_all whose proto is zero. And
xfrm_id_proto_match() doesn't consider them as a match with
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY in this case.
Proto with value 0 is probably not a valid value, at least
verify_newsa_info() doesn't consider it valid either.
This patch fixes it by checking the proto value in
validate_tmpl() and rejecting invalid ones, like what iproute2
does in xfrm_xfrmproto_getbyname().
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkal...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1402,6 +1402,21 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ switch (ut[i].id.proto) {
+ case IPPROTO_AH:
+ case IPPROTO_ESP:
+ case IPPROTO_COMP:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
+ case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
+#endif
+ case IPSEC_PROTO_ANY:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
}
return 0;
