Re: [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies

2014-02-11 Thread Jingoo Han
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:09 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 02/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > > The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide > > the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy > > PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies

2014-02-11 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 02/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM framework. Thus, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is not required

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies

2014-02-11 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 02/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM framework. Thus, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is not required

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies

2014-02-11 Thread Jingoo Han
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:09 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: On 02/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM

[PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies

2014-02-09 Thread Jingoo Han
The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM framework. Thus, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is not required anymore. Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han ---

[PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies

2014-02-09 Thread Jingoo Han
The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM framework. Thus, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is not required anymore. Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han