From: Nava kishore Manne
This patch fixes the below warning
-->Block comments should align the * on each line.
-->suspect code indent for conditional statements.
-->Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index 2d9f27e34d31..26653bf89e58 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -198,10 +198,10 @@ static inline void zynq_gpio_get_bank_pin(unsigned int
pin_num,
for (bank = 0; bank < gpio->p_data->max_bank; bank++) {
if ((pin_num >= gpio->p_data->bank_min[bank]) &&
(pin_num <= gpio->p_data->bank_max[bank])) {
- *bank_num = bank;
- *bank_pin_num = pin_num -
- gpio->p_data->bank_min[bank];
- return;
+ *bank_num = bank;
+ *bank_pin_num = pin_num -
+ gpio->p_data->bank_min[bank];
+ return;
}
}
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused zynq_gpio_runtime_resume(struct
device *dev)
return clk_prepare_enable(gpio->clk);
}
-static int zynq_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+static int zynq_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
{
int ret;
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static int zynq_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned offset)
return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
}
-static void zynq_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+static void zynq_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
{
pm_runtime_put(chip->parent);
}
--
1.9.1
