subject:"\[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12\/67\] KVM\: x86\: add support for emulating UMIP"

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

2018-03-19 Thread Sasha Levin

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:46:39AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Sasha Levin" <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
>> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonz...@redhat.com>, "Sasha Levin" 
>> <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 5:57:36 AM
>> Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating 
>> UMIP
>>
>> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 66336cab3531d3325ebde36a047250c42cb5 ]
>>
>> The User-Mode Instruction Prevention feature present in recent Intel
>> processor prevents a group of instructions (sgdt, sidt, sldt, smsw, and
>> str) from being executed with CPL > 0. Otherwise, a general protection
>> fault is issued.
>>
>> UMIP instructions in general are also able to trigger vmexits, so we can
>> actually emulate UMIP on older processors.  This commit sets up the
>> infrastructure so that kvm-intel.ko and kvm-amd.ko can set the UMIP
>> feature bit for CPUID even if the feature is not actually available
>> in hardware.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
>
>This is not enough (there were a couple bugs, plus you have not
>added the changes needed to the handle SLDT, STR, etc. in the
>emulator).  But since this is a feature, why is it being backported
>to 4.14, especially without any testing??

Hi Paolo,

They were proposed for stable as part of the automatic patch selection
process. I'll drop this patch.

-- 

Thanks,
Sasha

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

2018-03-19 Thread Sasha Levin

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:46:39AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Sasha Levin" 
>> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" , "Sasha Levin" 
>> 
>> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 5:57:36 AM
>> Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating 
>> UMIP
>>
>> From: Paolo Bonzini 
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 66336cab3531d3325ebde36a047250c42cb5 ]
>>
>> The User-Mode Instruction Prevention feature present in recent Intel
>> processor prevents a group of instructions (sgdt, sidt, sldt, smsw, and
>> str) from being executed with CPL > 0. Otherwise, a general protection
>> fault is issued.
>>
>> UMIP instructions in general are also able to trigger vmexits, so we can
>> actually emulate UMIP on older processors.  This commit sets up the
>> infrastructure so that kvm-intel.ko and kvm-amd.ko can set the UMIP
>> feature bit for CPUID even if the feature is not actually available
>> in hardware.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li 
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
>
>This is not enough (there were a couple bugs, plus you have not
>added the changes needed to the handle SLDT, STR, etc. in the
>emulator).  But since this is a feature, why is it being backported
>to 4.14, especially without any testing??

Hi Paolo,

They were proposed for stable as part of the automatic patch selection
process. I'll drop this patch.

-- 

Thanks,
Sasha

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

2018-03-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini



- Original Message -
> From: "Sasha Levin" <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonz...@redhat.com>, "Sasha Levin" 
> <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 5:57:36 AM
> Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating 
> UMIP
> 
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 66336cab3531d3325ebde36a047250c42cb5 ]
> 
> The User-Mode Instruction Prevention feature present in recent Intel
> processor prevents a group of instructions (sgdt, sidt, sldt, smsw, and
> str) from being executed with CPL > 0. Otherwise, a general protection
> fault is issued.
> 
> UMIP instructions in general are also able to trigger vmexits, so we can
> actually emulate UMIP on older processors.  This commit sets up the
> infrastructure so that kvm-intel.ko and kvm-amd.ko can set the UMIP
> feature bit for CPUID even if the feature is not actually available
> in hardware.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>

This is not enough (there were a couple bugs, plus you have not
added the changes needed to the handle SLDT, STR, etc. in the
emulator).  But since this is a feature, why is it being backported
to 4.14, especially without any testing??

Thanks,

Paolo

> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c| 2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c  | 6 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c  | 6 ++
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4f8b80199672..52ecf9b2f61e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1004,6 +1004,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>   void (*handle_external_intr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>   bool (*mpx_supported)(void);
>   bool (*xsaves_supported)(void);
> + bool (*umip_emulated)(void);
>  
>   int (*check_nested_events)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 13f5d4217e4f..f3fc225f5ebb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2
> *entry, u32 function,
>   unsigned f_invpcid = kvm_x86_ops->invpcid_supported() ? F(INVPCID) : 0;
>   unsigned f_mpx = kvm_mpx_supported() ? F(MPX) : 0;
>   unsigned f_xsaves = kvm_x86_ops->xsaves_supported() ? F(XSAVES) : 0;
> + unsigned f_umip = kvm_x86_ops->umip_emulated() ? F(UMIP) : 0;
>  
>   /* cpuid 1.edx */
>   const u32 kvm_cpuid_1_edx_x86_features =
> @@ -476,6 +477,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2
> *entry, u32 function,
>   entry->ebx |= F(TSC_ADJUST);
>   entry->ecx &= kvm_cpuid_7_0_ecx_x86_features;
>   cpuid_mask(>ecx, CPUID_7_ECX);
> + entry->ecx |= f_umip;
>   /* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow paging. */
>   if (!tdp_enabled || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
>   entry->ecx &= ~F(PKU);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index e0bc3ad0f6cd..8ea19bf09202 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -5322,6 +5322,11 @@ static bool svm_xsaves_supported(void)
>   return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool svm_umip_emulated(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
>  static bool svm_has_wbinvd_exit(void)
>  {
>   return true;
> @@ -5633,6 +5638,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init =
> {
>   .invpcid_supported = svm_invpcid_supported,
>   .mpx_supported = svm_mpx_supported,
>   .xsaves_supported = svm_xsaves_supported,
> + .umip_emulated = svm_umip_emulated,
>  
>   .set_supported_cpuid = svm_set_supported_cpuid,
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 5ffde16253cb..924d88d5ca35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -9212,6 +9212,11 @@ static bool vmx_xsaves_supported(void)
>   SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
>  }
>  
> +static bool vmx_umip_emulated(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
>  static void vmx_recover_nmi_blocking(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>  {
>   u32 exit_intr_info;
> @@ -12252,6 +12257,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init
> = {
>   .handle_external_intr = vmx_handle_external_intr,
>   .mpx_supported = vmx_mpx_supported,
>   .xsaves_supported = vmx_xsaves_supported,
> + .umip_emulated = vmx_umip_emulated,
>  
>   .check_nested_events = vmx_check_nested_events,
>  
> --
> 2.14.1
>

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

2018-03-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini



- Original Message -
> From: "Sasha Levin" 
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" , "Sasha Levin" 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 5:57:36 AM
> Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating 
> UMIP
> 
> From: Paolo Bonzini 
> 
> [ Upstream commit 66336cab3531d3325ebde36a047250c42cb5 ]
> 
> The User-Mode Instruction Prevention feature present in recent Intel
> processor prevents a group of instructions (sgdt, sidt, sldt, smsw, and
> str) from being executed with CPL > 0. Otherwise, a general protection
> fault is issued.
> 
> UMIP instructions in general are also able to trigger vmexits, so we can
> actually emulate UMIP on older processors.  This commit sets up the
> infrastructure so that kvm-intel.ko and kvm-amd.ko can set the UMIP
> feature bit for CPUID even if the feature is not actually available
> in hardware.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 

This is not enough (there were a couple bugs, plus you have not
added the changes needed to the handle SLDT, STR, etc. in the
emulator).  But since this is a feature, why is it being backported
to 4.14, especially without any testing??

Thanks,

Paolo

> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c| 2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c  | 6 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c  | 6 ++
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4f8b80199672..52ecf9b2f61e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1004,6 +1004,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>   void (*handle_external_intr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>   bool (*mpx_supported)(void);
>   bool (*xsaves_supported)(void);
> + bool (*umip_emulated)(void);
>  
>   int (*check_nested_events)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 13f5d4217e4f..f3fc225f5ebb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2
> *entry, u32 function,
>   unsigned f_invpcid = kvm_x86_ops->invpcid_supported() ? F(INVPCID) : 0;
>   unsigned f_mpx = kvm_mpx_supported() ? F(MPX) : 0;
>   unsigned f_xsaves = kvm_x86_ops->xsaves_supported() ? F(XSAVES) : 0;
> + unsigned f_umip = kvm_x86_ops->umip_emulated() ? F(UMIP) : 0;
>  
>   /* cpuid 1.edx */
>   const u32 kvm_cpuid_1_edx_x86_features =
> @@ -476,6 +477,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2
> *entry, u32 function,
>   entry->ebx |= F(TSC_ADJUST);
>   entry->ecx &= kvm_cpuid_7_0_ecx_x86_features;
>   cpuid_mask(>ecx, CPUID_7_ECX);
> + entry->ecx |= f_umip;
>   /* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow paging. */
>   if (!tdp_enabled || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
>   entry->ecx &= ~F(PKU);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index e0bc3ad0f6cd..8ea19bf09202 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -5322,6 +5322,11 @@ static bool svm_xsaves_supported(void)
>   return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool svm_umip_emulated(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
>  static bool svm_has_wbinvd_exit(void)
>  {
>   return true;
> @@ -5633,6 +5638,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init =
> {
>   .invpcid_supported = svm_invpcid_supported,
>   .mpx_supported = svm_mpx_supported,
>   .xsaves_supported = svm_xsaves_supported,
> + .umip_emulated = svm_umip_emulated,
>  
>   .set_supported_cpuid = svm_set_supported_cpuid,
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 5ffde16253cb..924d88d5ca35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -9212,6 +9212,11 @@ static bool vmx_xsaves_supported(void)
>   SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
>  }
>  
> +static bool vmx_umip_emulated(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
>  static void vmx_recover_nmi_blocking(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>  {
>   u32 exit_intr_info;
> @@ -12252,6 +12257,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init
> = {
>   .handle_external_intr = vmx_handle_external_intr,
>   .mpx_supported = vmx_mpx_supported,
>   .xsaves_supported = vmx_xsaves_supported,
> + .umip_emulated = vmx_umip_emulated,
>  
>   .check_nested_events = vmx_check_nested_events,
>  
> --
> 2.14.1
>

[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

2018-03-07 Thread Sasha Levin

From: Paolo Bonzini 

[ Upstream commit 66336cab3531d3325ebde36a047250c42cb5 ]

The User-Mode Instruction Prevention feature present in recent Intel
processor prevents a group of instructions (sgdt, sidt, sldt, smsw, and
str) from being executed with CPL > 0. Otherwise, a general protection
fault is issued.

UMIP instructions in general are also able to trigger vmexits, so we can
actually emulate UMIP on older processors.  This commit sets up the
infrastructure so that kvm-intel.ko and kvm-amd.ko can set the UMIP
feature bit for CPUID even if the feature is not actually available
in hardware.

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c| 2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c  | 6 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c  | 6 ++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4f8b80199672..52ecf9b2f61e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1004,6 +1004,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
void (*handle_external_intr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool (*mpx_supported)(void);
bool (*xsaves_supported)(void);
+   bool (*umip_emulated)(void);
 
int (*check_nested_events)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 13f5d4217e4f..f3fc225f5ebb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 
*entry, u32 function,
unsigned f_invpcid = kvm_x86_ops->invpcid_supported() ? F(INVPCID) : 0;
unsigned f_mpx = kvm_mpx_supported() ? F(MPX) : 0;
unsigned f_xsaves = kvm_x86_ops->xsaves_supported() ? F(XSAVES) : 0;
+   unsigned f_umip = kvm_x86_ops->umip_emulated() ? F(UMIP) : 0;
 
/* cpuid 1.edx */
const u32 kvm_cpuid_1_edx_x86_features =
@@ -476,6 +477,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 
*entry, u32 function,
entry->ebx |= F(TSC_ADJUST);
entry->ecx &= kvm_cpuid_7_0_ecx_x86_features;
cpuid_mask(>ecx, CPUID_7_ECX);
+   entry->ecx |= f_umip;
/* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow paging. */
if (!tdp_enabled || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
entry->ecx &= ~F(PKU);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index e0bc3ad0f6cd..8ea19bf09202 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -5322,6 +5322,11 @@ static bool svm_xsaves_supported(void)
return false;
 }
 
+static bool svm_umip_emulated(void)
+{
+   return false;
+}
+
 static bool svm_has_wbinvd_exit(void)
 {
return true;
@@ -5633,6 +5638,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
.invpcid_supported = svm_invpcid_supported,
.mpx_supported = svm_mpx_supported,
.xsaves_supported = svm_xsaves_supported,
+   .umip_emulated = svm_umip_emulated,
 
.set_supported_cpuid = svm_set_supported_cpuid,
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 5ffde16253cb..924d88d5ca35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -9212,6 +9212,11 @@ static bool vmx_xsaves_supported(void)
SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
 }
 
+static bool vmx_umip_emulated(void)
+{
+   return false;
+}
+
 static void vmx_recover_nmi_blocking(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 {
u32 exit_intr_info;
@@ -12252,6 +12257,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = 
{
.handle_external_intr = vmx_handle_external_intr,
.mpx_supported = vmx_mpx_supported,
.xsaves_supported = vmx_xsaves_supported,
+   .umip_emulated = vmx_umip_emulated,
 
.check_nested_events = vmx_check_nested_events,
 
-- 
2.14.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

2018-03-07 Thread Sasha Levin

From: Paolo Bonzini 

[ Upstream commit 66336cab3531d3325ebde36a047250c42cb5 ]

The User-Mode Instruction Prevention feature present in recent Intel
processor prevents a group of instructions (sgdt, sidt, sldt, smsw, and
str) from being executed with CPL > 0. Otherwise, a general protection
fault is issued.

UMIP instructions in general are also able to trigger vmexits, so we can
actually emulate UMIP on older processors.  This commit sets up the
infrastructure so that kvm-intel.ko and kvm-amd.ko can set the UMIP
feature bit for CPUID even if the feature is not actually available
in hardware.

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c| 2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c  | 6 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c  | 6 ++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4f8b80199672..52ecf9b2f61e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1004,6 +1004,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
void (*handle_external_intr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool (*mpx_supported)(void);
bool (*xsaves_supported)(void);
+   bool (*umip_emulated)(void);
 
int (*check_nested_events)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 13f5d4217e4f..f3fc225f5ebb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 
*entry, u32 function,
unsigned f_invpcid = kvm_x86_ops->invpcid_supported() ? F(INVPCID) : 0;
unsigned f_mpx = kvm_mpx_supported() ? F(MPX) : 0;
unsigned f_xsaves = kvm_x86_ops->xsaves_supported() ? F(XSAVES) : 0;
+   unsigned f_umip = kvm_x86_ops->umip_emulated() ? F(UMIP) : 0;
 
/* cpuid 1.edx */
const u32 kvm_cpuid_1_edx_x86_features =
@@ -476,6 +477,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 
*entry, u32 function,
entry->ebx |= F(TSC_ADJUST);
entry->ecx &= kvm_cpuid_7_0_ecx_x86_features;
cpuid_mask(>ecx, CPUID_7_ECX);
+   entry->ecx |= f_umip;
/* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow paging. */
if (!tdp_enabled || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
entry->ecx &= ~F(PKU);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index e0bc3ad0f6cd..8ea19bf09202 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -5322,6 +5322,11 @@ static bool svm_xsaves_supported(void)
return false;
 }
 
+static bool svm_umip_emulated(void)
+{
+   return false;
+}
+
 static bool svm_has_wbinvd_exit(void)
 {
return true;
@@ -5633,6 +5638,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
.invpcid_supported = svm_invpcid_supported,
.mpx_supported = svm_mpx_supported,
.xsaves_supported = svm_xsaves_supported,
+   .umip_emulated = svm_umip_emulated,
 
.set_supported_cpuid = svm_set_supported_cpuid,
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 5ffde16253cb..924d88d5ca35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -9212,6 +9212,11 @@ static bool vmx_xsaves_supported(void)
SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
 }
 
+static bool vmx_umip_emulated(void)
+{
+   return false;
+}
+
 static void vmx_recover_nmi_blocking(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 {
u32 exit_intr_info;
@@ -12252,6 +12257,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = 
{
.handle_external_intr = vmx_handle_external_intr,
.mpx_supported = vmx_mpx_supported,
.xsaves_supported = vmx_xsaves_supported,
+   .umip_emulated = vmx_umip_emulated,
 
.check_nested_events = vmx_check_nested_events,
 
-- 
2.14.1

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 12/67] KVM: x86: add support for emulating UMIP

6 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information