Jianchao,
> In scsi core, __scsi_queue_insert should just put request back on
> the queue and retry using the same command as before. However, for
> blk-mq, scsi_mq_requeue_cmd is employed here which will unprepare
> the request. To align with the semantics of __scsi_queue_insert,
> use
Jianchao,
> In scsi core, __scsi_queue_insert should just put request back on
> the queue and retry using the same command as before. However, for
> blk-mq, scsi_mq_requeue_cmd is employed here which will unprepare
> the request. To align with the semantics of __scsi_queue_insert,
> use
Hi Martin
Can you take your precious time to review this ?
Thanks in advice.
Jianchao
On 03/03/2018 09:54 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> In scsi core, __scsi_queue_insert should just put request back on
> the queue and retry using the same command as before. However, for
> blk-mq,
Hi Martin
Can you take your precious time to review this ?
Thanks in advice.
Jianchao
On 03/03/2018 09:54 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> In scsi core, __scsi_queue_insert should just put request back on
> the queue and retry using the same command as before. However, for
> blk-mq,
In scsi core, __scsi_queue_insert should just put request back on
the queue and retry using the same command as before. However, for
blk-mq, scsi_mq_requeue_cmd is employed here which will unprepare
the request. To align with the semantics of __scsi_queue_insert,
use blk_mq_requeue_request with
In scsi core, __scsi_queue_insert should just put request back on
the queue and retry using the same command as before. However, for
blk-mq, scsi_mq_requeue_cmd is employed here which will unprepare
the request. To align with the semantics of __scsi_queue_insert,
use blk_mq_requeue_request with
6 matches
Mail list logo
