Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] vsock: Fix SO_ZEROCOPY on accept()ed vsocks

2026-01-05 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :

On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 20:43:09 +0100 you wrote:
> vsock has its own handling of setsockopt(SO_ZEROCOPY). Which works just
> fine unless socket comes from a call to accept(). Because
> SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT flag is missing, attempting to set the option always
> results in errno EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj 
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v2,1/2] vsock: Make accept()ed sockets use custom setsockopt()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ce5e612dd411
  - [net,v2,2/2] vsock/test: Test setting SO_ZEROCOPY on accept()ed socket
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/caa20e9e155b

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[PATCH net v2 0/2] vsock: Fix SO_ZEROCOPY on accept()ed vsocks

2025-12-29 Thread Michal Luczaj
vsock has its own handling of setsockopt(SO_ZEROCOPY). Which works just
fine unless socket comes from a call to accept(). Because
SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT flag is missing, attempting to set the option always
results in errno EOPNOTSUPP.

Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj 
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix: set socket flags in a consistent way [Stefano]
- Test: simplify sync by removing sync [Stefano]
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251223-vsock-child-sock-custom-sockopt-v1-0-4654a75d0...@rbox.co

---
Michal Luczaj (2):
  vsock: Make accept()ed sockets use custom setsockopt()
  vsock/test: Test setting SO_ZEROCOPY on accept()ed socket

 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c |  4 
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 32 
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 58fc7342b529803d3c221101102fe913df7adb83
change-id: 20251222-vsock-child-sock-custom-sockopt-23b779c30c8f

Best regards,
-- 
Michal Luczaj