Hi Philipp,
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 18:37 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > +struct reset_simple_devdata {
> > > > > + bool inverted;
> > >
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct reset_simple_devdata reset_simple_inverted =
> > > {
> > > + .inverted = true,
> >
> > Hmm. I think it would
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 10:47 -0700, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On 08/11/2017 06:06 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > index 52d5251660b9b..f7ba01a71daee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/rese
Hi Philipp,
On 08/11/2017 06:06 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
index 52d5251660b9b..f7ba01a71daee 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ config RESET_PISTACHIO
help
This enab
Hi Alexandru,
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 09:04 -0700, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> On 08/11/2017 06:06 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > index 52d5251660b9b..f7ba01a71daee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > +++
Hi Phillip,
On 08/11/2017 06:06 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
index 52d5251660b9b..f7ba01a71daee 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ config RESET_PISTACHIO
help
This enab
Hi Dinh,
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 10:39 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> This patch is failing to apply on both v4.13-rc4 and linux-next:
>
> error: patch failed: drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c:108
> error: drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0001 reset: add
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 23:51 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > +static int reset_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > + of_
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Split reusable parts out of the sunxi driver, to add a driver for simple
> reset controllers with reset lines that can be controlled by toggling
> bits in exclusive, contiguous register ranges using read-modify-write
> cycles under a spinlock
Hi Phillip,
This patch is failing to apply on both v4.13-rc4 and linux-next:
error: patch failed: drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c:108
error: drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 reset: add reset-simple to unify socfpga, stm32,
sunxi, and zx2967
On 08/11/2017 08:06
Split reusable parts out of the sunxi driver, to add a driver for simple
reset controllers with reset lines that can be controlled by toggling
bits in exclusive, contiguous register ranges using read-modify-write
cycles under a spinlock. The separate sunxi driver still remains to
register the early
10 matches
Mail list logo