On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:52:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> <--- ?
>
> So all patches before are nice and verbose in explaining what they do.
> Where did the commit message of this one disappear?
>
> :-)
>
> Or is
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:52:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> <--- ?
>
> So all patches before are nice and verbose in explaining what they do.
> Where did the commit message of this one disappear?
>
> :-)
>
> Or is it that obvious
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:52:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
<--- ?
So all patches before are nice and verbose in explaining what they do.
Where did the commit message of this one disappear?
:-)
Or is it that obvious that we should have a stack canary? How about some
text *why* we need it?
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:52:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
<--- ?
So all patches before are nice and verbose in explaining what they do.
Where did the commit message of this one disappear?
:-)
Or is it that obvious that we should have a stack canary? How about some
text *why* we need it?
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/process.c| 3 +++
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 8
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/process.c| 3 +++
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 8
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
6 matches
Mail list logo