On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:21:51PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
[..]
> It just seems to me that we should stop pretending that the
> filesystem-dax facility requires block devices and try to move this
> functionality to generically use a dax device across all interfaces.
That sounds reasonable and
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:21:51PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:28 PM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > From: Stefan Hajnoczi
> >
> > Although struct dax_device itself is not tied to a block device, some
> > DAX code assumes there is a block device. Make block devices
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:28 PM Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>
> Although struct dax_device itself is not tied to a block device, some
> DAX code assumes there is a block device. Make block devices optional
> by allowing bdev to be NULL in commonly used DAX APIs.
>
> When there
From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Although struct dax_device itself is not tied to a block device, some
DAX code assumes there is a block device. Make block devices optional
by allowing bdev to be NULL in commonly used DAX APIs.
When there is no block device:
* Skip the partition offset calculation in
4 matches
Mail list logo
