Hi Masahiro,
On 19/09/16 04:01, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Sig
In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer
---
Changes in v
2 matches
Mail list logo