On 02/22/2018 08:37 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 21 February 2018 at 14:13, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
>>> wrote:
On 02/14/2018
On 02/22/2018 08:37 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 21 February 2018 at 14:13, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
>>> wrote:
On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Stopped the
On 21 February 2018 at 14:13, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
> On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Stopped the
On 21 February 2018 at 14:13, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
> On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
On 02/21/2018 01:13 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> BTW, with the current set on Peter's sched/testing,
On 02/21/2018 01:13 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> BTW, with the current set on Peter's sched/testing, update_nohz_stats()
> is called
On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>>> decayed. We introduce a new
On 02/16/2018 01:44 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect
On 02/16/2018 05:02 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 13:53, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>>> decayed. We introduce a new
On 02/16/2018 05:02 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 13:53, Valentin Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect
On 16 February 2018 at 13:53, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
>> CPUs has
On 16 February 2018 at 13:53, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
>> CPUs has blocked load that have to be
On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
>> CPUs has
On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
wrote:
> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
>> CPUs has blocked load that have to be
On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
> CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
> is set everytime
On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
> CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
> is set everytime
On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
> CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
> is set everytime
On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
> CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
> is set everytime
Hi Vincent,
here are some possible small code improvement suggestions from my side.
Cheers Patrick
On 14-Feb 16:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
> > decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
> >
Hi Vincent,
here are some possible small code improvement suggestions from my side.
Cheers Patrick
On 14-Feb 16:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
> > decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
> >
Hi Patrick,
On 15 February 2018 at 16:22, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> here are some possible small code improvement suggestions from my side.
>
> Cheers Patrick
>
> On 14-Feb 16:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when
Hi Patrick,
On 15 February 2018 at 16:22, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> here are some possible small code improvement suggestions from my side.
>
> Cheers Patrick
>
> On 14-Feb 16:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
On 15-Feb 17:50, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:22:47PM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > > static struct {
> > > > cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> > > > atomic_t nr_cpus;
> > > > + int has_blocked;/* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> >
>
On 15-Feb 17:50, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:22:47PM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > > static struct {
> > > > cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> > > > atomic_t nr_cpus;
> > > > + int has_blocked;/* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> >
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:22:47PM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > static struct {
> > > cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> > > atomic_t nr_cpus;
> > > + int has_blocked;/* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
>
> Why not "bool"?
>
Because then he gets me yelling that
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:22:47PM +, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > static struct {
> > > cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> > > atomic_t nr_cpus;
> > > + int has_blocked;/* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
>
> Why not "bool"?
>
Because then he gets me yelling that
Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
is set everytime that a Idle CPU can have blocked load and it is then clear
Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
is set everytime that a Idle CPU can have blocked load and it is then clear
28 matches
Mail list logo