Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] ASoC: atmel-classd: remove aclk clock from DT binding

2017-09-01 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/10, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Since gclk (generated-clk) is now able to determine the rate of the > audio_pll, there is no need for classd to have a direct phandle to the > audio_pll while already having a phandle to gclk. > > This binding is used by no board in mainline so it is safe to be >

Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] ASoC: atmel-classd: remove aclk clock from DT binding

2017-09-01 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/10, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Since gclk (generated-clk) is now able to determine the rate of the > audio_pll, there is no need for classd to have a direct phandle to the > audio_pll while already having a phandle to gclk. > > This binding is used by no board in mainline so it is safe to be >

[PATCH v5 6/7] ASoC: atmel-classd: remove aclk clock from DT binding

2017-08-10 Thread Quentin Schulz
Since gclk (generated-clk) is now able to determine the rate of the audio_pll, there is no need for classd to have a direct phandle to the audio_pll while already having a phandle to gclk. This binding is used by no board in mainline so it is safe to be modified. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz

[PATCH v5 6/7] ASoC: atmel-classd: remove aclk clock from DT binding

2017-08-10 Thread Quentin Schulz
Since gclk (generated-clk) is now able to determine the rate of the audio_pll, there is no need for classd to have a direct phandle to the audio_pll while already having a phandle to gclk. This binding is used by no board in mainline so it is safe to be modified. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz