On 2016/09/21 09:17PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Currently Perf annotate support code navigation (branches and calls)
> only when run on the same architecture where perf.data was recorded.
> But, for example, record on powerpc server and annotate on client's
> x86 desktop is not supported.
>
> This
On 2016/09/21 09:17PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Currently Perf annotate support code navigation (branches and calls)
> only when run on the same architecture where perf.data was recorded.
> But, for example, record on powerpc server and annotate on client's
> x86 desktop is not supported.
>
> This
Hello,
Any updates?
Arnaldo, if patches looks good to you, can you please pickup them.
-Ravi
On Wednesday 21 September 2016 09:17 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Currently Perf annotate support code navigation (branches and calls)
> only when run on the same architecture where perf.data was
Hello,
Any updates?
Arnaldo, if patches looks good to you, can you please pickup them.
-Ravi
On Wednesday 21 September 2016 09:17 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Currently Perf annotate support code navigation (branches and calls)
> only when run on the same architecture where perf.data was
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:48:13 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2016 01:04 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >> Kim, I don't have arm test machine.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:48:13 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2016 01:04 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> >> Kim, I don't have arm test machine. Can you please help me to test
> >> this on arm.
> > This works for
On Thursday 22 September 2016 01:04 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> Kim, I don't have arm test machine. Can you please help me to test
>> this on arm.
> This works for me: hitting return on return
On Thursday 22 September 2016 01:04 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>> Kim, I don't have arm test machine. Can you please help me to test
>> this on arm.
> This works for me: hitting return on return instructions yields
> "Invalid jump
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Kim, I don't have arm test machine. Can you please help me to test
> this on arm.
This works for me: hitting return on return instructions yields
"Invalid jump offset", but I'll get that later.
Thanks,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530
Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Kim, I don't have arm test machine. Can you please help me to test
> this on arm.
This works for me: hitting return on return instructions yields
"Invalid jump offset", but I'll get that later.
Thanks,
Kim
Currently Perf annotate support code navigation (branches and calls)
only when run on the same architecture where perf.data was recorded.
But, for example, record on powerpc server and annotate on client's
x86 desktop is not supported.
This patchset adds supports for that.
Example:
Record on
Currently Perf annotate support code navigation (branches and calls)
only when run on the same architecture where perf.data was recorded.
But, for example, record on powerpc server and annotate on client's
x86 desktop is not supported.
This patchset adds supports for that.
Example:
Record on
12 matches
Mail list logo