On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:09:37PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 11:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> > bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:09:37PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 11:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> > bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> >
> >
On 11/16/2017 11:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>
> 909657615d9b ("scsi: libsas: allow async aborts")
>
>
> The regression
On 11/16/2017 11:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>
> 909657615d9b ("scsi: libsas: allow async aborts")
>
>
> The regression
Hi Christoph,
A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
909657615d9b ("scsi: libsas: allow async aborts")
The regression was introduced as of v4.12-rc1, and it still exists in
4.14
Hi Christoph,
A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
909657615d9b ("scsi: libsas: allow async aborts")
The regression was introduced as of v4.12-rc1, and it still exists in
4.14
6 matches
Mail list logo
