Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-04-27 12:20:55) > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will > > stall otherwise? > > Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch. > > I opted to drop the Cc:

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-04-27 12:20:55) > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will > > stall otherwise? > > Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch. > > I opted to drop the Cc: stable for now. This

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will > stall otherwise? Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch. I opted to drop the Cc: stable for now. This doesn't mean it can't be backported

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will > stall otherwise? Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch. I opted to drop the Cc: stable for now. This doesn't mean it can't be backported later on, I'm just

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

Hi Anusha, Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will stall otherwise? I see that the significance of testing with the 4.14 kernel enabled the firmware to be included in the latest Chrome OS kernel (

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

Hi Anusha, Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will stall otherwise? I see that the significance of testing with the 4.14 kernel enabled the firmware to be included in the latest Chrome OS kernel (

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis wrote: > Hi all: > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest > drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we > could declare this FW as acceptable and

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis wrote: > Hi all: > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest > drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we > could declare this FW as acceptable and healthy to be used with kernel

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Wajdeczko, Michal <michal.wajdec...@intel.com> Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake >-Original Message- >From: Vivi, Rodrigo >Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 11:04 AM >To: Jani Niku

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

...@linux.ie; Greg KH ; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Wajdeczko, Michal Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake >-Original Message- >From: Vivi, Rodrigo

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

><gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux- >ker...@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; dri- >de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Wajdeczko, Michal <michal.wajdec...@intel.com> >Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for >Gemi

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

ger.kernel.org; dri- >de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Wajdeczko, Michal >Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for >Geminilake > >On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:02:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" wrote: >> >>

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

inuxfoundation.org>; > >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; > >>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- > >>de...@lists.freedesktop.org > >>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

>>To: Ian W MORRISON > >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo ; Srivatsa, Anusha > >>; Wajdeczko, Michal > >>; Greg KH ; > >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; > >>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.free

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: > > What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? > > BR, > Jani.

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: > > What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? > > BR, > Jani. I did some basic testing including running a 4K

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

va...@intel.com>; Wajdeczko, Michal >> >><michal.wajdec...@intel.com>; Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; >> >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; >> >>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-..

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

er.kernel.org; >> >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- >> >>de...@lists.freedesktop.org >> >>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for >> >>Geminilake In summary so far: Jani: > NAK on ind

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

ation.org>; > >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; > >>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- > >>de...@lists.freedesktop.org > >>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

ORRISON > >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo ; Srivatsa, Anusha > >>; Wajdeczko, Michal > >>; Greg KH ; > >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; > >>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

t;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- >>de...@lists.freedesktop.org >>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for >>Geminilake >> >>On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

eczko, Michal >>; Greg KH ; >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; >>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >>sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- >>de...@lists.freedesktop.org >>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Ad

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

;; Wajdeczko, Michal ><michal.wajdec...@intel.com>; Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; >airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- >de...@lists.freedesktop.org >

RE: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

ntel.com; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >sta...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- >de...@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for >Geminilake > >On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> >>

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 11 April 2018 at 22:27, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> >> >>> >>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >>> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them.

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 11 April 2018 at 22:27, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> >> >>> >>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >>> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >>> >> >> I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > >> >> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >> > > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and > v4.15

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > >> >> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >> > > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and > v4.15 kernels which I have

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

> > NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older > kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier kernels didn't

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

> > NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older > kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier kernels didn't

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, ianwmorri...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ian W MORRISON > > As the Geminilake firmware is now merged to linux-firmware.git > use MODUE_FIRMWARE to load the firmware. > > This removes the error message in the dmesg log: > > i915 :00:02.0: Direct

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, ianwmorri...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ian W MORRISON > > As the Geminilake firmware is now merged to linux-firmware.git > use MODUE_FIRMWARE to load the firmware. > > This removes the error message in the dmesg log: > > i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for >

[RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

From: Ian W MORRISON As the Geminilake firmware is now merged to linux-firmware.git use MODUE_FIRMWARE to load the firmware. This removes the error message in the dmesg log: i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/glk_dmc_ver1_04.bin failed with

[RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

From: Ian W MORRISON As the Geminilake firmware is now merged to linux-firmware.git use MODUE_FIRMWARE to load the firmware. This removes the error message in the dmesg log: i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/glk_dmc_ver1_04.bin failed with error -2 i915