On 8/11/2017 8:30 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/10/2017 11:15 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Hi Jens,
Could you please take a look at below patch and the issue it is trying
to solve. Please let us know your thoughts on the below problem and the
patch.
It looks reasonable to me. I'll queue it up fo
On 08/10/2017 11:15 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Could you please take a look at below patch and the issue it is trying
> to solve. Please let us know your thoughts on the below problem and the
> patch.
It looks reasonable to me. I'll queue it up for 4.14.
--
Jens Axboe
Hi Jens,
Could you please take a look at below patch and the issue it is trying
to solve. Please let us know your thoughts on the below problem and the
patch.
Regards
Ritesh
On 8/9/2017 6:28 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
In below scenario blkio cgroup does not work as per their assigned
weigh
In below scenario blkio cgroup does not work as per their assigned
weights :-
1. When the underlying device is nonrotational with a single HW queue
with depth of >= CFQ_HW_QUEUE_MIN
2. When the use case is forming two blkio cgroups cg1(weight 1000) &
cg2(wight 100) and two processes(file1 and file2
4 matches
Mail list logo