Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rajendra, On 15/03/17 03:47, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > Hey Jon, > Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts on how we can move this forward? >>> >>> At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and >>> Stephen more about these

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rajendra, On 15/03/17 03:47, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > Hey Jon, > Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts on how we can move this forward? >>> >>> At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and >>> Stephen more about these

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 13/03/17 14:42, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 13 March 2017 at 15:09, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> +Björn >>> >>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, Looks

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 13/03/17 14:42, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 13 March 2017 at 15:09, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> +Björn >>> >>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hey Jon, Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts on how we can move this forward? At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and Stephen more about these related issues. It definitely seems like we need to progress with this somehow,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hey Jon, Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts on how we can move this forward? At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and Stephen more about these related issues. It definitely seems like we need to progress with this somehow,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Geert, On 13/03/17 14:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Geert, On 13/03/17 14:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: > +Björn > > On

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 13 March 2017 at 15:09, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> +Björn >> >> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, >>> >>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 13 March 2017 at 15:09, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> +Björn >> >> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, >>> >>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts >>> on how we can move this

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: +Björn On 13 March 2017 at 10:37,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: +Björn On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: > Looks like there is

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Geert, On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> +Björn >>> >>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: Looks like there is

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Geert, On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> +Björn >>> >>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> +Björn >> >> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts >>> on how we

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> +Björn >> >> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts >>> on how we can move this forward? >> >> At the Linaro

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Ulf, On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: > +Björn > > On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, >> >> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts >> on how we can move this forward? > > At the Linaro Connect

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Ulf, On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote: > +Björn > > On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, >> >> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts >> on how we can move this forward? > > At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

+Björn On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, > > Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts > on how we can move this forward? At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and Stephen more

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

+Björn On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, > > Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts > on how we can move this forward? At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and Stephen more about these related

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts on how we can move this forward? Cheers Jon On 28/02/17 15:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 20/09/16 11:28,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf, Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts on how we can move this forward? Cheers Jon On 28/02/17 15:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 02/28/2017 08:48 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi all, > > On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> - XUSBB: Device

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 02/28/2017 08:48 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi all, > > On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> - XUSBB: Device

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> - XUSBB: Device

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi all, On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: > The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device > controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: > - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) > - XUSBB: Device controller > - XUSBC: Host controller > > These power

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi all, On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote: > The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device > controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: > - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) > - XUSBB: Device controller > - XUSBC: Host controller > > These power

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 29/11/16 11:33, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks for pointing to my patches, but I would like to clarify a few > things. > > On 2016-11-24 03:30, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: Jon Hunter

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 29/11/16 11:33, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks for pointing to my patches, but I would like to clarify a few > things. > > On 2016-11-24 03:30, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: Jon Hunter writes: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Stephen, Thanks for pointing to my patches, but I would like to clarify a few things. On 2016-11-24 03:30, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote: On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: Jon Hunter writes: However, I would rather the client of the

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Stephen, Thanks for pointing to my patches, but I would like to clarify a few things. On 2016-11-24 03:30, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote: On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: Jon Hunter writes: However, I would rather the client of the power-domains specify which

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > Jon Hunter writes: > > > >> However, I would rather the client of > >> the power-domains specify which power-domains they require and > >> dynamically nested the power-domains at runtime. This is

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > Jon Hunter writes: > > > >> However, I would rather the client of > >> the power-domains specify which power-domains they require and > >> dynamically nested the power-domains at runtime. This is slightly > >> different

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 22/11/16 21:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> Jon Hunter writes: >>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 22/11/16 21:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> Jon Hunter writes: >>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22/11/16 21:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Jon Hunter writes: >> >>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22/11/16 21:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Jon Hunter writes: >> >>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Kevin, Ulf, > > On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/22/2016 06:35 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 November 2016 at 16:39, Stanimir Varbanov > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/22/2016 06:35 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 November 2016 at 16:39, Stanimir Varbanov > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Hi Jon, >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jon Hunter writes: > >> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Kevin, Ulf, On 03/11/16 14:20,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jon Hunter writes: > >> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Kevin, Ulf, On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jon Hunter writes: > >> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Kevin, Ulf, On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jon Hunter writes: > >> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Kevin, Ulf, On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Jon Hunter writes: > On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Kevin, Ulf, >>> >>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: ...

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Jon Hunter writes: > On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Kevin, Ulf, >>> >>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: ... Second, another way of seeing this

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22/11/16 13:31, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 22 November 2016 at 12:12, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: ... >>> There is a design limitation to that, however. >>> >>> The PM domain concept really is about intercepting the flow of PM >>>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22/11/16 13:31, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 22 November 2016 at 12:12, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: ... >>> There is a design limitation to that, however. >>> >>> The PM domain concept really is about intercepting the flow of PM >>> callbacks for a device in

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22 November 2016 at 12:12, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Kevin, Ulf, >>> >>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 22 November 2016 at 12:12, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Kevin, Ulf, >>> >>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: ...

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 17 November 2016 at 16:39, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> >> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: Hi Jon, On

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 17 November 2016 at 16:39, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> >> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: Hi Jon, On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Kevin, Ulf, >> >> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>> Second, another way of seeing this is:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Kevin, Ulf, >> >> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>> Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi, On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> Hi Jon, >>> >>> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi, On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> Hi Jon, >>> >>> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Rajendra, >>> >>> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Rajendra, >>> >>> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rajendra,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Rajendra, >> >> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> >>> On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 07:04,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Rajendra, >> >> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> >>> On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Kevin, Ulf, > > On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current >> runtime selected configuration

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Kevin, Ulf, > > On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current >> runtime selected configuration you need to

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Kevin, Ulf, On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: > > ... > > Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current > runtime selected configuration you need to re-configure the PM domain > topology - but the device would still

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Kevin, Ulf, On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: > > ... > > Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current > runtime selected configuration you need to re-configure the PM domain > topology - but the device would still

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: ... Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current runtime selected configuration you need to re-configure the PM domain topology - but the device would still remain in the same PM domain. In other words, you would

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote: ... Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current runtime selected configuration you need to re-configure the PM domain topology - but the device would still remain in the same PM domain. In other words, you would

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rajendra, > > On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Rajendra, >>> >>> On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > The

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Jon, On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rajendra, > > On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Rajendra, >>> >>> On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > The

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device controllers) is

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device controllers) is

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 10/10/16 15:04, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 10 October 2016 at 13:18, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 10/10/16 15:04, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 10 October 2016 at 13:18, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device controllers) is partitioned

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 10 October 2016 at 13:18, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >>> controllers) is partitioned

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 10 October 2016 at 13:18, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >>> - XUSBA:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> -

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> - XUSBB: Device

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: > The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device > controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: > - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) > - XUSBB: Device controller > - XUSBC: Host

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote: > The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device > controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: > - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) > - XUSBB: Device controller > - XUSBC: Host controller > > These power

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rajendra, > > On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >>> -

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rajendra, > > On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >>> -

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> - XUSBB:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Hi Rajendra, On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device >> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: >> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) >> - XUSBB:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device > controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: > - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) > - XUSBB: Device controller > - XUSBC: Host controller > > These power

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device > controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: > - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) > - XUSBB: Device controller > - XUSBC: Host controller > > These power

[RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) - XUSBB: Device controller - XUSBC: Host controller These power domains are not nested and can be powered-up and down

[RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are: - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0) - XUSBB: Device controller - XUSBC: Host controller These power domains are not nested and can be powered-up and down