Re: [RFC v1 5/7] clk: meson: meson8b: mark the CPU clock as CLK_IS_CRITICAL

2018-11-15 Thread Jerome Brunet
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 23:57 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > We don't want the common clock framework to disable the "cpu_clk" if > it's not used by any device. The cpufreq-dt driver does not enable the > CPU clocks. However, even if it would we would still want the CPU clock > to be enabled at

Re: [RFC v1 5/7] clk: meson: meson8b: mark the CPU clock as CLK_IS_CRITICAL

2018-11-15 Thread Jerome Brunet
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 23:57 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > We don't want the common clock framework to disable the "cpu_clk" if > it's not used by any device. The cpufreq-dt driver does not enable the > CPU clocks. However, even if it would we would still want the CPU clock > to be enabled at

[RFC v1 5/7] clk: meson: meson8b: mark the CPU clock as CLK_IS_CRITICAL

2018-11-14 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
We don't want the common clock framework to disable the "cpu_clk" if it's not used by any device. The cpufreq-dt driver does not enable the CPU clocks. However, even if it would we would still want the CPU clock to be enabled at all times because the CPU clock is also required even if we disable

[RFC v1 5/7] clk: meson: meson8b: mark the CPU clock as CLK_IS_CRITICAL

2018-11-14 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
We don't want the common clock framework to disable the "cpu_clk" if it's not used by any device. The cpufreq-dt driver does not enable the CPU clocks. However, even if it would we would still want the CPU clock to be enabled at all times because the CPU clock is also required even if we disable