On 2 Feb 2018, at 17:47, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 02:16:39PM +, Robert Harris wrote:
>> I was planning to annotate the opaque calculation in
>> __fragmentation_index() but on closer inspection I think there may be a
>> bug. I could use some feedback.
A belated thank you f
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 02:16:39PM +, Robert Harris wrote:
> I was planning to annotate the opaque calculation in
> __fragmentation_index() but on closer inspection I think there may be a
> bug. I could use some feedback.
>
> Firstly, for the case of fragmentation and ignoring the scaling,
>
I was planning to annotate the opaque calculation in
__fragmentation_index() but on closer inspection I think there may be a
bug. I could use some feedback.
Firstly, for the case of fragmentation and ignoring the scaling,
__fragmentation_index() purports to return a value in the range 0 to 1.
Gen
3 matches
Mail list logo