Re: [patch 14/24] x86/speculation: Unify conditional spectre v2 print functions

* Thomas Gleixner wrote: > There is no point in having two functions and a conditional at the call > site. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner patches 1-14: Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar 15-24 look good to me too, modulo the (mostly trivial) feedback I gave. Thanks, Ingo

Re: [patch 14/24] x86/speculation: Unify conditional spectre v2 print functions

* Thomas Gleixner wrote: > There is no point in having two functions and a conditional at the call > site. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner patches 1-14: Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar 15-24 look good to me too, modulo the (mostly trivial) feedback I gave. Thanks, Ingo

[patch 14/24] x86/speculation: Unify conditional spectre v2 print functions

There is no point in having two functions and a conditional at the call site. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -257,15

[patch 14/24] x86/speculation: Unify conditional spectre v2 print functions

There is no point in having two functions and a conditional at the call site. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -257,15