Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-20 Thread Gabriel C
On 19.10.2016 15:45, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:25 +0200 > Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:04AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> Already being fixed, please take a look at the thread starting at >>> 20161016002205.GA9686@vader;

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-20 Thread Gabriel C
On 19.10.2016 15:45, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:25 +0200 > Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:04AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> Already being fixed, please take a look at the thread starting at >>> 20161016002205.GA9686@vader; for your

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-19 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:25 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:04AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Already being fixed, please take a look at the thread starting at > > 20161016002205.GA9686@vader; for your convenience I've put Nicholas Piggin's > >

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-19 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:25 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:04AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Already being fixed, please take a look at the thread starting at > > 20161016002205.GA9686@vader; for your convenience I've put Nicholas Piggin's > > initial work, my

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:04AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Already being fixed, please take a look at the thread starting at > 20161016002205.GA9686@vader; for your convenience I've put Nicholas Piggin's > initial work, my lousy but works-for-me fix for x86, Arnd Bergmann's for arm > at

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:10:04AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Already being fixed, please take a look at the thread starting at > 20161016002205.GA9686@vader; for your convenience I've put Nicholas Piggin's > initial work, my lousy but works-for-me fix for x86, Arnd Bergmann's for arm > at

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:29:15PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.10.18 at 22:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. > > > > When I revert > > > > 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actu

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:29:15PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.10.18 at 22:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. > > > > When I revert > > > > 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actu

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.10.18 at 22:29 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.10.18 at 22:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Hey Al, > > > > I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. > > > > When I revert > > > > 784d5699e

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.10.18 at 22:29 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.10.18 at 22:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Hey Al, > > > > I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. > > > > When I revert > > > > 784d5699e

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.10.18 at 22:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hey Al, > > I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. > > When I revert > > 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions") > > the warnings are gone. I'm seeing the same

Re: 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.10.18 at 22:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hey Al, > > I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. > > When I revert > > 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions") > > the warnings are gone. I'm seeing the same

784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hey Al, I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. When I revert 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions") the warnings are gone. I'm attaching my .config. Let me know if you need more info from me. Thanks. WARNING: "__fentry__" [virt/l

784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions")

2016-10-18 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hey Al, I see the gazillion warnings below when building -rc1 here. When I revert 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions") the warnings are gone. I'm attaching my .config. Let me know if you need more info from me. Thanks. WARNING: "__fentry__" [virt/l