Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-21 Thread Pintu Kumar
Dear Lucas, Can you give me some pointers on how to set affinity for entire GPIO Bank. Currently I am exploring drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c to find out how the GPIO banks are set up. I also found that affinity can be set using: desc->irq_data.affinity, may be by using cpumask_copy(...). But still I

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-21 Thread Pintu Kumar
Dear Lucas, Can you give me some pointers on how to set affinity for entire GPIO Bank. Currently I am exploring drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c to find out how the GPIO banks are set up. I also found that affinity can be set using: desc->irq_data.affinity, may be by using cpumask_copy(...). But still I

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-17 Thread Pintu Kumar
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-17 Thread Pintu Kumar
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO > >> interrupt ? > >> How to avoid

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-14 Thread Pintu Kumar
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO >> interrupt ? >> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? >>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-14 Thread Pintu Kumar
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO >> interrupt ? >> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? >> How do we assign GPIO

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-14 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: > Hi, > > Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO > interrupt ? > How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? > How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? > Is it possible to

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-14 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: > Hi, > > Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO > interrupt ? > How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? > How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? > Is it possible to

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-14 Thread Pintu Kumar
Hi, Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO interrupt ? How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so that GPIO interrupt can

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-14 Thread Pintu Kumar
Hi, Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO interrupt ? How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so that GPIO interrupt can

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Pintu Kumar
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I need one help. >> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Pintu Kumar
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I need one help. >> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 >> > >>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need one help. > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > > I wanted

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need one help. > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > > I wanted

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I need one help. > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I > tried the below steps: >

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I need one help. > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I > tried the below steps: >

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Pintu Kumar
Hi, I need one help. I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I tried the below steps: root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export root@10:~# echo "rising" >

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-05-11 Thread Pintu Kumar
Hi, I need one help. I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I tried the below steps: root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export root@10:~# echo "rising" >

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-04-06 Thread Admins
Please notice that the mail sent by you to dd...@safe-mail.net has been rejected. Reason: The mailbox of dd...@safe-mail.net is full. The message was received by the safe-mail.net secure mailing system. The safe-mail.net system enables people to exchange confidential information in a highly

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2018-04-06 Thread Admins
Please notice that the mail sent by you to dd...@safe-mail.net has been rejected. Reason: The mailbox of dd...@safe-mail.net is full. The message was received by the safe-mail.net secure mailing system. The safe-mail.net system enables people to exchange confidential information in a highly

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2016-09-28 Thread gengdongjiu
Hi, In the kernel 4.1, I am confused for the runnable_avg_sum/avg_period/running_avg_sum, for example below code. Does the task runnable_avg_sum includes running_avg_sum? Does avg_period includes the task runnable_avg_sum and the task sleep time? thank you. static inline void

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2016-09-28 Thread gengdongjiu
Hi, In the kernel 4.1, I am confused for the runnable_avg_sum/avg_period/running_avg_sum, for example below code. Does the task runnable_avg_sum includes running_avg_sum? Does avg_period includes the task runnable_avg_sum and the task sleep time? thank you. static inline void

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2014-03-06 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jagdish Gedia wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Thanks for you informative reply. > I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per > second. > > I have tried below things. > My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver. > > inside cdc-acm.c file, > > static

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2014-03-06 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jagdish Gedia wrote: Hi Alan, Thanks for you informative reply. I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second. I have tried below things. My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver. inside cdc-acm.c file, static struct

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2014-03-05 Thread Jagdish Gedia
Hi Alan, Thanks for you informative reply. I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second. I have tried below things. My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver. inside cdc-acm.c file, static struct usb_device *usb_device; static int acm_probe(, )

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2014-03-05 Thread Jagdish Gedia
Hi Alan, Thanks for you informative reply. I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second. I have tried below things. My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver. inside cdc-acm.c file, static struct usb_device *usb_device; static int acm_probe(, )

Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2001-06-13 Thread William Scott Lockwood III
Gee Andre, I guess people who use hotmail don't have an opinion you'd care to read? - Original Message - From: +ADw-postmaster+AEA-mail.hotmail.com+AD4- To: +ADw-thatlinuxguy+AEA-hotmail.com+AD4- Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) +AD4

Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2001-06-13 Thread William Scott Lockwood III
Gee Andre, I guess people who use hotmail don't have an opinion you'd care to read? - Original Message - From: +ADw-postmaster+AEA-mail.hotmail.com+AD4- To: +ADw-thatlinuxguy+AEA-hotmail.com+AD4- Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) +AD4