Dear Lucas,
Can you give me some pointers on how to set affinity for entire GPIO Bank.
Currently I am exploring drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c to find out how the
GPIO banks are set up.
I also found that affinity can be set using: desc->irq_data.affinity,
may be by using cpumask_copy(...).
But still I
Dear Lucas,
Can you give me some pointers on how to set affinity for entire GPIO Bank.
Currently I am exploring drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c to find out how the
GPIO banks are set up.
I also found that affinity can be set using: desc->irq_data.affinity,
may be by using cpumask_copy(...).
But still I
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO
> >> interrupt ?
> >> How to avoid
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO
>> interrupt ?
>> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ?
>>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO
>> interrupt ?
>> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ?
>> How do we assign GPIO
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO
> interrupt ?
> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ?
> How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ?
> Is it possible to
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO
> interrupt ?
> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ?
> How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ?
> Is it possible to
Hi,
Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO interrupt ?
How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ?
How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ?
Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so
that GPIO interrupt can
Hi,
Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO interrupt ?
How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ?
How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ?
Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so
that GPIO interrupt can
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I need one help.
>> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I need one help.
>> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
>> >
>>
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need one help.
> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
> >
> > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21
> > I wanted
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need one help.
> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
> >
> > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21
> > I wanted
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need one help.
> I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
>
> Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21
> I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I
> tried the below steps:
>
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need one help.
> I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
>
> Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21
> I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I
> tried the below steps:
>
Hi,
I need one help.
I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21
I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I
tried the below steps:
root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export
root@10:~# echo "rising" >
Hi,
I need one help.
I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15
Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21
I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I
tried the below steps:
root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export
root@10:~# echo "rising" >
Please notice that the mail sent by you to dd...@safe-mail.net
has been rejected.
Reason: The mailbox of dd...@safe-mail.net is full.
The message was received by the safe-mail.net secure mailing system.
The safe-mail.net system enables people to exchange confidential
information in a highly
Please notice that the mail sent by you to dd...@safe-mail.net
has been rejected.
Reason: The mailbox of dd...@safe-mail.net is full.
The message was received by the safe-mail.net secure mailing system.
The safe-mail.net system enables people to exchange confidential
information in a highly
Hi,
In the kernel 4.1, I am confused for the
runnable_avg_sum/avg_period/running_avg_sum,
for example below code.
Does the task runnable_avg_sum includes running_avg_sum? Does avg_period
includes the task runnable_avg_sum and the task sleep time? thank you.
static inline void
Hi,
In the kernel 4.1, I am confused for the
runnable_avg_sum/avg_period/running_avg_sum,
for example below code.
Does the task runnable_avg_sum includes running_avg_sum? Does avg_period
includes the task runnable_avg_sum and the task sleep time? thank you.
static inline void
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jagdish Gedia wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thanks for you informative reply.
> I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per
> second.
>
> I have tried below things.
> My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver.
>
> inside cdc-acm.c file,
>
> static
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jagdish Gedia wrote:
Hi Alan,
Thanks for you informative reply.
I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per
second.
I have tried below things.
My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver.
inside cdc-acm.c file,
static struct
Hi Alan,
Thanks for you informative reply.
I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second.
I have tried below things.
My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver.
inside cdc-acm.c file,
static struct usb_device *usb_device;
static int acm_probe(, )
Hi Alan,
Thanks for you informative reply.
I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second.
I have tried below things.
My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver.
inside cdc-acm.c file,
static struct usb_device *usb_device;
static int acm_probe(, )
Gee Andre, I guess people who use hotmail don't have an opinion you'd care
to read?
- Original Message -
From: +ADw-postmaster+AEA-mail.hotmail.com+AD4-
To: +ADw-thatlinuxguy+AEA-hotmail.com+AD4-
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:12 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
+AD4
Gee Andre, I guess people who use hotmail don't have an opinion you'd care
to read?
- Original Message -
From: +ADw-postmaster+AEA-mail.hotmail.com+AD4-
To: +ADw-thatlinuxguy+AEA-hotmail.com+AD4-
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:12 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
+AD4
28 matches
Mail list logo