> > __iomem *base)
> >
> > static inline void ftm_irq_acknowledge(void __iomem *base) {
> > - u32 val;
> > + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
>
> Do you expect the jiffies to be updated when we are in the timer irq handler ?
>
Oops, my bad. Will correct that using
> > __iomem *base)
> >
> > static inline void ftm_irq_acknowledge(void __iomem *base) {
> > - u32 val;
> > + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
>
> Do you expect the jiffies to be updated when we are in the timer irq handler ?
>
Oops, my bad. Will correct that using
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:46:01PM +0800, Meng Yi wrote:
> If the FTM counter reaches the FTM_MOD value between the reading of the
> TOF bit and the writing of 0 to the TOF bit, the process of clearing the
> TOF bit does not work as expected when FTMx_CONF[NUMTOF] != 0 and the
> current TOF count
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:46:01PM +0800, Meng Yi wrote:
> If the FTM counter reaches the FTM_MOD value between the reading of the
> TOF bit and the writing of 0 to the TOF bit, the process of clearing the
> TOF bit does not work as expected when FTMx_CONF[NUMTOF] != 0 and the
> current TOF count
4 matches
Mail list logo
