Il 24/02/2014 16:37, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
So patch v5 would be applied except you will remove the incorrect
hunk, and you will send a patch strengthenning guest_supported_xcr0?
Yes.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
>> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32
>> index, u64 xcr) u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
>> u64 valid_bits;
>>
>> +if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
>>
Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
@@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
u64 valid_bits;
+ if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
+ xcr0 &=
Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
@@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu-arch.xcr0;
u64 valid_bits;
+ if (!kvm_x86_ops-mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops-mpx_supported())
+ xcr0 =
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
@@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32
index, u64 xcr) u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu-arch.xcr0;
u64 valid_bits;
+if (!kvm_x86_ops-mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops-mpx_supported())
+
Il 24/02/2014 16:37, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
So patch v5 would be applied except you will remove the incorrect
hunk, and you will send a patch strengthenning guest_supported_xcr0?
Yes.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
6 matches
Mail list logo
