Re: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
Hi Steve, On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:14:54PM +, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: > > > > > This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the > > > > > pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. [...] > > > we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that > > > all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as > > > follows: > > >dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA > > >dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF > > > > > > We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not > > > marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision. > > > Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon > > > variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the > > > markings on the chips? > > > > > > There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere. [...] > Phytec informs us that you already asked them for this and have > confirmed that you should have all necessary information now No, it's completely unclear: a) You said above that the 0x3 silicon is pre-production and thus you removed that from the kernel. b) Phytec says you didn't mark the PMICs as preproduction in any way. The question is still, which one is correct? If a), I'm wondering why Phytec didn't get that information. If b), the 0x3 variant must not be removed from the kernel. Could you clarify that? rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0| Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
Hi Steve, On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:14:54PM +, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. [...] we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as follows: dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision. Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the markings on the chips? There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere. [...] Phytec informs us that you already asked them for this and have confirmed that you should have all necessary information now No, it's completely unclear: a) You said above that the 0x3 silicon is pre-production and thus you removed that from the kernel. b) Phytec says you didn't mark the PMICs as preproduction in any way. The question is still, which one is correct? If a), I'm wondering why Phytec didn't get that information. If b), the 0x3 variant must not be removed from the kernel. Could you clarify that? rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0| Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
On 17 March 2014 08:34, Steve Twiss wrote: >On 14 March 2014 14:37 Philipp Zabel wrote: >>Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 + schrieb Lee Jones: >>> > From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] >>> > >>> > Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This >>> > new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. >>> > >>> > This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the >>> > pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. >>> > >>> > There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: >>> > it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to >>> > the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before >>> > the variant ID test. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] >>> >>> Applied, thanks. >> >>we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that >>all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as >>follows: >>dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA >>dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF >>We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not >>marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision. >>Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon >>variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the >>markings on the chips? >>There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere. > >I will speak with our AEs this morning and try and get an answer to this one. Hi Philipp, Phytec informs us that you already asked them for this and have confirmed that you should have all necessary information now Best regards, Steve
RE: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
On 17 March 2014 08:34, Steve Twiss wrote: On 14 March 2014 14:37 Philipp Zabel wrote: Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 + schrieb Lee Jones: From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before the variant ID test. Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com Applied, thanks. we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as follows: dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision. Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the markings on the chips? There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere. I will speak with our AEs this morning and try and get an answer to this one. Hi Philipp, Phytec informs us that you already asked them for this and have confirmed that you should have all necessary information now Best regards, Steve
RE: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
On 14 March 2014 14:37 Philipp Zabel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 + schrieb Lee Jones:
>> > From: Opensource [Steve Twiss]
>> >
>> > Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This
>> > new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063.
>> >
>> > This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the
>> > pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip.
>> >
>> > There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch:
>> > it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to
>> > the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before
>> > the variant ID test.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss]
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
>
>we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that
>all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as
>follows:
>dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA
>dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF
>We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not
>marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision.
I will speak with our AEs this morning and try and get an answer to this one.
>Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon
>variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the
>markings on the chips?
>There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere.
Regards,
Steve
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+{zX����ܨ}���Ơz�:+v���zZ+��+zf���h���~i���z� �w���?�&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
RE: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
On 14 March 2014 14:37 Philipp Zabel wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 + schrieb Lee Jones:
From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com
Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This
new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063.
This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the
pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip.
There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch:
it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to
the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before
the variant ID test.
Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com
Applied, thanks.
we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that
all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as
follows:
dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA
dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF
We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not
marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision.
I will speak with our AEs this morning and try and get an answer to this one.
Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon
variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the
markings on the chips?
There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere.
Regards,
Steve
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+{zX����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v���zZ+��+zf���h���~i���z� �w���?��)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
Re: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
Hi, Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 + schrieb Lee Jones: > > From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] > > > > Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This > > new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. > > > > This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the > > pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. > > > > There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: > > it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to > > the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before > > the variant ID test. > > > > Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] > > Applied, thanks. we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as follows: dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision. Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the markings on the chips? There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
Hi, Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 + schrieb Lee Jones: From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before the variant ID test. Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com Applied, thanks. we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as follows: dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision. Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the markings on the chips? There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] > > Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This > new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. > > This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the > pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. > > There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: > it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to > the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before > the variant ID test. > > Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] Applied, thanks. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code
From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before the variant ID test. Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com Applied, thanks. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
