* zhangxiliang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hello,
>I have some questions for your patches.
>
Hi,
> > Paravirt and alternatives are always done when SMP is
> > inactive, so there is no
> > need to use locks.
>
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_KPROBES
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > - /* It
* zhangxiliang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
hello,
I have some questions for your patches.
Hi,
Paravirt and alternatives are always done when SMP is
inactive, so there is no
need to use locks.
-#ifndef CONFIG_KPROBES
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- /* It must still be
break;
}
}
if (dirty && ++kprobe_garbage_slots > INSNS_PER_PAGE)
collect_garbage_slots();
+ mutex_unlock(_mutex);
}
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
hello,
I have some questions for your patches.
> Paravirt and alternatives are always done when SMP is
> inactive, so there is no
> need to use locks.
> -#ifndef CONFIG_KPROBES
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> - /* It must still be possible to apply SMP alternatives. */
> - if
hello,
I have some questions for your patches.
Paravirt and alternatives are always done when SMP is
inactive, so there is no
need to use locks.
-#ifndef CONFIG_KPROBES
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- /* It must still be possible to apply SMP alternatives. */
- if
Of zhangxiliang
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:19 PM
To: 'Mathieu Desnoyers'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Ingo
Molnar'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Andi Kleen'
Subject: RE: [patch 05/24] Text Edit Lock - Architecture
Independent Code
hello,
I have some questions for your patches.
Paravirt
6 matches
Mail list logo