Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-12 Thread Oleg Verych
Hi, Bill. Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:16:01AM -0400: [] > >Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. > > So anything that wasn't implemented a decade ago is not useful? Virtual > machines, software raid, fair scheduling, jumbo packets, SMT/SMP/NUMA > support, support

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-12 Thread Bill Davidsen
Alan Cox wrote: Jan's code is here today and it works fine for me. How can you coherently argue against the plain fact that his feature solves my usecases perfectly fine, So add a notifier for console printk output. Then you can keep whatever out of kernel patches you like for printk output

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-12 Thread Bill Davidsen
Oleg Verych wrote: Hallo, Ingo. On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:07:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: To clarify. `Scrollback' here is *useful* scrollback during early boot and OOPs (which is absent, AFAIK), "nothing like that" is coloring of the messages by loglevel. even if it were true (which it

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-12 Thread Bill Davidsen
Oleg Verych wrote: Hallo, Ingo. On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:07:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: To clarify. `Scrollback' here is *useful* scrollback during early boot and OOPs (which is absent, AFAIK), nothing like that is coloring of the messages by loglevel. even if it were true (which it

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-12 Thread Bill Davidsen
Alan Cox wrote: Jan's code is here today and it works fine for me. How can you coherently argue against the plain fact that his feature solves my usecases perfectly fine, So add a notifier for console printk output. Then you can keep whatever out of kernel patches you like for printk output

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-12 Thread Oleg Verych
Hi, Bill. Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:16:01AM -0400: [] Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. So anything that wasn't implemented a decade ago is not useful? Virtual machines, software raid, fair scheduling, jumbo packets, SMT/SMP/NUMA support, support for

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:56:09PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Oct 7 2007 21:13, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >There are two distinct populations : > > - those [...] > >who would never have imagined that pressing Escape > >during the boot of windows 3.1/95 provided them with the full

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:47:25PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: > > > On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > >* Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 08 October 2007 00:10:10 Rene Herman wrote: > I find Alan's suggestion to provide the functionality the same way you'd > provide for translated kernel messages (seeing as how there also are people > that want those) much more sensible. By the way, I agree that this is the best approach.

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:01:33AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Oct 8 2007 01:02, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > >If you are not going to see OOPes of new kernels running old distros, ask > >any perl hacker (as they lovely mentioned in lkml) to hack for you > >something like: > > > >sed -u -e '

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 08 October 2007 00:10:10 Rene Herman wrote: > On 10/08/2007 12:40 AM, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > Splash screens are clearly cosmetic, and it's kind of shameful (imo) that > > important messages explaining real problems are obscured from view by > > functionless splash screens. > >

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Alan Cox
> is bogus, they're very functionally separable ideas. A coloured oops seems to > be a good way of telling novice users what information is relevant to their > bug report. Unless they are colour blind or on a system like a PDA with a mono display 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/08/2007 12:40 AM, Alistair John Strachan wrote: Splash screens are clearly cosmetic, and it's kind of shameful (imo) that important messages explaining real problems are obscured from view by functionless splash screens. They're not functionless. You (and I) might not care for the

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 07 October 2007 20:13:09 you wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: > > On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >* Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years > > >>ago. > > > > >

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 8 2007 01:02, Oleg Verych wrote: > >If you are not going to see OOPes of new kernels running old distros, ask >any perl hacker (as they lovely mentioned in lkml) to hack for you >something like: > >sed -u -e ' >/^<1/s_^_'$COLOR1'_ >/^<2/s_^_'$COLOR2'_ >/^<3/s_^_'$COLOR3'_

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:11:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would say that while I'm not particularly fond of flashy colors > > everywhere, I think that being able to use colors to indicate > > particular actions in progress or conditions

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Alan Cox
> Jan's code is here today and it works fine for me. How can you > coherently argue against the plain fact that his feature solves my > usecases perfectly fine, So add a notifier for console printk output. Then you can keep whatever out of kernel patches you like for printk output in chinese,

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For instance, anyone who has experienced read errors on and IDE disk > > knows that it can literally take hours/days to boot, after > > displaying thousands of messages. Here, having the ability to see > > that no IRQ was assigned or something like

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would say that while I'm not particularly fond of flashy colors > everywhere, I think that being able to use colors to indicate > particular actions in progress or conditions can be a good thing. RAID > errors, devices disabled due to

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 10:04 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 7 2007 22:00, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 09:56 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Some is good, as long as it is not excessive. While I could imagine that Knoppix will abuse the feature and use vt.printk_color=9,9,9,9,11,10,12, this is not

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 09:56 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Some is good, as long as it is not excessive. While I could imagine that Knoppix will abuse the feature and use vt.printk_color=9,9,9,9,11,10,12, this is not what serious people would do. [1] http://tinyurl.com/yr9zgq [2]

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 21:27, Rene Herman wrote: > > I saw you remark on FB console in a reply to Alan just now and I > quite agree with you. The (current) FB console is slow and I'll add > "dumb" myself. When you have a 1280x1024 screen available, you get > to do cool things like put up nice little

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 22:00, Rene Herman wrote: > On 10/07/2007 09:56 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> Some is good, as long as it is not excessive. While I could imagine that >> Knoppix will abuse the feature and use vt.printk_color=9,9,9,9,11,10,12, this >> is not what serious people would do. >> >> [1]

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 09:13 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: But well, there actually have been worse arguments given that VGA console is getting less and less important. I recently did a perusal of alternative distributions and didn't find a

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 21:13, Willy Tarreau wrote: >There are two distinct populations : > - those [...] >who would never have imagined that pressing Escape >during the boot of windows 3.1/95 provided them with the full text >messages. This is news to me. DOS always showed messages, and

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: > > On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > >* Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 08:58 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 7 2007 20:47, Rene Herman wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on lkml. "Ay. World is finished. Everyone can go home and watch

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: > On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >* Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years > >>ago. > > > >Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 20:47, Rene Herman wrote: > >> > Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years >> > ago. >> >> Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on lkml. > > "Ay. World is finished. Everyone can go home and watch Friends reruns now." > > But

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on lkml. "Ay. World is finished. Everyone can go home and watch

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 13:10, Oleg Verych wrote: >This `scrollback' is usual late boot / console one. If fact useful, >until first tty switch or if `screen` cannot be used. But for some >reason if scrolling region (DECSTBM) is less than whole screen, nothing >works. Actually, scrolling begins to work

Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

2007-10-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > even if it were true (which it isnt), that is not an argument > > against including a useful change that exists now and that people > > are interested in. > > Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years > ago.

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: even if it were true (which it isnt), that is not an argument against including a useful change that exists now and that people are interested in. Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 13:10, Oleg Verych wrote: This `scrollback' is usual late boot / console one. If fact useful, until first tty switch or if `screen` cannot be used. But for some reason if scrolling region (DECSTBM) is less than whole screen, nothing works. Actually, scrolling begins to work once

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on lkml. Ay. World is finished. Everyone can go home and watch

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 20:47, Rene Herman wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on lkml. Ay. World is finished. Everyone can go home and watch Friends reruns now. But well, there actually

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 08:58 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 7 2007 20:47, Rene Herman wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on lkml. Ay. World is finished. Everyone can go home and watch

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago.

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 09:13 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: But well, there actually have been worse arguments given that VGA console is getting less and less important. I recently did a perusal of alternative distributions and didn't find a

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 21:13, Willy Tarreau wrote: There are two distinct populations : - those [...] who would never have imagined that pressing Escape during the boot of windows 3.1/95 provided them with the full text messages. This is news to me. DOS always showed messages, and under

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 09:56 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Some is good, as long as it is not excessive. While I could imagine that Knoppix will abuse the feature and use vt.printk_color=9,9,9,9,11,10,12, this is not what serious people would do. [1] http://tinyurl.com/yr9zgq [2]

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 21:27, Rene Herman wrote: I saw you remark on FB console in a reply to Alan just now and I quite agree with you. The (current) FB console is slow and I'll add dumb myself. When you have a 1280x1024 screen available, you get to do cool things like put up nice little windows and

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 7 2007 22:00, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 09:56 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Some is good, as long as it is not excessive. While I could imagine that Knoppix will abuse the feature and use vt.printk_color=9,9,9,9,11,10,12, this is not what serious people would do. [1]

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/07/2007 10:04 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 7 2007 22:00, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 09:56 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Some is good, as long as it is not excessive. While I could imagine that Knoppix will abuse the feature and use vt.printk_color=9,9,9,9,11,10,12, this is not

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would say that while I'm not particularly fond of flashy colors everywhere, I think that being able to use colors to indicate particular actions in progress or conditions can be a good thing. RAID errors, devices disabled due to command-line

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance, anyone who has experienced read errors on and IDE disk knows that it can literally take hours/days to boot, after displaying thousands of messages. Here, having the ability to see that no IRQ was assigned or something like this

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Alan Cox
Jan's code is here today and it works fine for me. How can you coherently argue against the plain fact that his feature solves my usecases perfectly fine, So add a notifier for console printk output. Then you can keep whatever out of kernel patches you like for printk output in chinese,

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:11:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would say that while I'm not particularly fond of flashy colors everywhere, I think that being able to use colors to indicate particular actions in progress or conditions can be a

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 8 2007 01:02, Oleg Verych wrote: If you are not going to see OOPes of new kernels running old distros, ask any perl hacker (as they lovely mentioned in lkml) to hack for you something like: sed -u -e ' /^1/s_^_'$COLOR1'_ /^2/s_^_'$COLOR2'_ /^3/s_^_'$COLOR3'_ /^4/s_^_'$COLOR4'_

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 07 October 2007 20:13:09 you wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years ago. Congratulations, this

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Rene Herman
On 10/08/2007 12:40 AM, Alistair John Strachan wrote: Splash screens are clearly cosmetic, and it's kind of shameful (imo) that important messages explaining real problems are obscured from view by functionless splash screens. They're not functionless. You (and I) might not care for the

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Alan Cox
is bogus, they're very functionally separable ideas. A coloured oops seems to be a good way of telling novice users what information is relevant to their bug report. Unless they are colour blind or on a system like a PDA with a mono display 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:01:33AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 8 2007 01:02, Oleg Verych wrote: If you are not going to see OOPes of new kernels running old distros, ask any perl hacker (as they lovely mentioned in lkml) to hack for you something like: sed -u -e '

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 08 October 2007 00:10:10 Rene Herman wrote: On 10/08/2007 12:40 AM, Alistair John Strachan wrote: Splash screens are clearly cosmetic, and it's kind of shameful (imo) that important messages explaining real problems are obscured from view by functionless splash screens. They're

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 08 October 2007 00:10:10 Rene Herman wrote: I find Alan's suggestion to provide the functionality the same way you'd provide for translated kernel messages (seeing as how there also are people that want those) much more sensible. By the way, I agree that this is the best approach.

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:47:25PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: On 10/07/2007 06:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coloring

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2) + `Subject:' usage

2007-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:56:09PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 7 2007 21:13, Willy Tarreau wrote: There are two distinct populations : - those [...] who would never have imagined that pressing Escape during the boot of windows 3.1/95 provided them with the full text