Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-07 um 18:36 schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> Am 2016-11-07 um 17:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: Chris Clayton wrote off list and the

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-07 um 18:36 schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> Am 2016-11-07 um 17:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: Chris Clayton wrote off list and the mentioned patch fixes

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 2016-11-07 um 17:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: >> Hello. >> >> Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: >>> Chris Clayton wrote off list and the mentioned patch fixes the problem >>> for me too, as

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 2016-11-07 um 17:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: >> Hello. >> >> Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: >>> Chris Clayton wrote off list and the mentioned patch fixes the problem >>> for me too, as it does for

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-07 um 17:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Hello. > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: >> Am 2016-11-07 um 09:24 schrieb Jani Nikula: >>> On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-07 um 17:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Hello. > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: >> Am 2016-11-07 um 09:24 schrieb Jani Nikula: >>> On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Hello. Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Am 2016-11-07 um 09:24 schrieb Jani Nikula: > > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > >> I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that we can fix > >> this here before the

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Hello. Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 16:34:35 CET schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Am 2016-11-07 um 09:24 schrieb Jani Nikula: > > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > >> I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that we can fix > >> this here before the release. I've

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-07 um 09:24 schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that we can fix >> this here before the release. I've ignored it the last few days though. > > You say it like filing the bug

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-07 um 09:24 schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that we can fix >> this here before the release. I've ignored it the last few days though. > > You say it like filing the bug report and having

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that we can fix > this here before the release. I've ignored it the last few days though. You say it like filing the bug report and having the bug fixed are mutually

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > I did not file a bug in bugzilla yet. I haven't given up that we can fix > this here before the release. I've ignored it the last few days though. You say it like filing the bug report and having the bug fixed are mutually exclusive things...

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-06 um 12:43 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Am 2016-11-06 um 12:21 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: >> On 01.11.2016 12:47, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: I'll come up with a nouveau system example and it was quite easy to

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-06 um 12:43 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Am 2016-11-06 um 12:21 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: >> On 01.11.2016 12:47, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: I'll come up with a nouveau system example and it was quite easy to bisect. To quote the

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-06 um 12:21 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > On 01.11.2016 12:47, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>> I'll come up with a nouveau system example and it was quite easy to bisect. >>> To quote the merge commit msg: >>> This also

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-11-06 um 12:21 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > On 01.11.2016 12:47, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>> I'll come up with a nouveau system example and it was quite easy to bisect. >>> To quote the merge commit msg: >>> This also required some changes

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On 01.11.2016 12:47, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> I'll come up with a nouveau system example and it was quite easy to bisect. >> To quote the merge commit msg: >> This also required some changes outside of the IOMMU code, but these are

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On 01.11.2016 12:47, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> I'll come up with a nouveau system example and it was quite easy to bisect. >> To quote the merge commit msg: >> This also required some changes outside of the IOMMU code, but these are >> acked by the

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 31. Oktober 2016 22:54:54 MEZ, schrieb Joerg Roedel : >>On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>> This is one machine booting a bad kernel. I could provide another >>> example later

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 31. Oktober 2016 22:54:54 MEZ, schrieb Joerg Roedel : >>On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>> This is one machine booting a bad kernel. I could provide another >>> example later this week. >> >>You have an Intel

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 31. Oktober 2016 22:54:54 MEZ, schrieb Joerg Roedel : >On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> This is one machine booting a bad kernel. I could provide another >> example later this week. > >You have an Intel system without any IOMMU (enabled),

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 31. Oktober 2016 22:54:54 MEZ, schrieb Joerg Roedel : >On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> This is one machine booting a bad kernel. I could provide another >> example later this week. > >You have an Intel system without any IOMMU (enabled), otherwise you

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > This is one machine booting a bad kernel. I could provide another > example later this week. You have an Intel system without any IOMMU (enabled), otherwise you would have a DMAR-ACPI table, but there is none: > [0.00]

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > This is one machine booting a bad kernel. I could provide another > example later this week. You have an Intel system without any IOMMU (enabled), otherwise you would have a DMAR-ACPI table, but there is none: > [0.00]

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-10-31 um 16:21 schrieb Joerg Roedel: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> In case the screenshot doesn't make it to you, here it is: >> https://postimg.org/image/5wl2wemt9/ > > Can you please send a boot-dmesg and 'lspci -v'? We need more > information

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

Am 2016-10-31 um 16:21 schrieb Joerg Roedel: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> In case the screenshot doesn't make it to you, here it is: >> https://postimg.org/image/5wl2wemt9/ > > Can you please send a boot-dmesg and 'lspci -v'? We need more > information

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > In case the screenshot doesn't make it to you, here it is: > https://postimg.org/image/5wl2wemt9/ Can you please send a boot-dmesg and 'lspci -v'? We need more information about your system first. Joerg

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > In case the screenshot doesn't make it to you, here it is: > https://postimg.org/image/5wl2wemt9/ Can you please send a boot-dmesg and 'lspci -v'? We need more information about your system first. Joerg

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

In case the screenshot doesn't make it to you, here it is: https://postimg.org/image/5wl2wemt9/ Am 31.10.2016 11:36 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: so guys, I can't believe that nobody hits this: Since -rc1 Nautilus' list of elements or Firefox' website window or just photos in eog (probably among

Re: [BUG][REGRESSION] mangled display since -rc1

In case the screenshot doesn't make it to you, here it is: https://postimg.org/image/5wl2wemt9/ Am 31.10.2016 11:36 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: so guys, I can't believe that nobody hits this: Since -rc1 Nautilus' list of elements or Firefox' website window or just photos in eog (probably among