* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:57:56AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > What we do know about the CPU vendor event names is that they are vendor
> > > specific,
> > > and that's a pretty stable property. So my suggestion would be to simply
> > > make it:
> > >
> > > perf list vendor
> > >
> > > with perhaps add aliases as well:
> > >
> > > perf list model
> > > perf list cpu-model
> > >
> > > ... and 'perf list hardware' should probably also list all the vendor
> > > specific
> > > hardware events as well.
> >
> > Sure can change it.
> >
> > >
> > > Could we please work a bit more on making vendor specific hardware event
> > > handling
> > > more usable to people who don't care about internals?
> >
> > Do you prefer fully new patches, or are incremential patches ok?
>
> I would like for you to base of my perf/urgent branch as of now, that
> has those two patches yanked out so that the others can go thru.
>
> Ingo, please consider pulling from the perf-urgent-for-mingo-20161017
> tag, just signed and pushed, it has:
>
> tag perf-urgent-for-mingo-20161017
> Tagger: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 17 11:26:10 2016 -0300
>
> perf/urgent fixes:
>
> - Fix handling of numa nodes in perf.data files (Jiri Olsa)
>
> - Fix scrolling when refreshing 'perf top --tui --hierarchy' entries
> (Namhyung Kim)
>
> - Fix building of JIT support on Ubuntu 16.04 (Anton Blanchard)
>
> - Fix handling of events including .c and .o, that were being treated as
> BPF scripts instead of vendor ones (Wang Nan)
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!
Ingo
