Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/18/2016, 03:54 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 18.12.2016 16:45, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Moreover, with some modules, __put_user_1 and others are reported >> instead of mcount. > > > nm vmlinux | grep __fentry__ > nm vmlinux | grep mcount > > What do these report ? I bet you that in

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/18/2016, 03:54 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 18.12.2016 16:45, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Moreover, with some modules, __put_user_1 and others are reported >> instead of mcount. > > > nm vmlinux | grep __fentry__ > nm vmlinux | grep mcount > > What do these report ? I bet you that in

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 18.12.2016 16:45, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Moreover, with some modules, __put_user_1 and others are reported > instead of mcount. nm vmlinux | grep __fentry__ nm vmlinux | grep mcount What do these report ? I bet you that in your vmlinux the first one would return something like :

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 18.12.2016 16:45, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Moreover, with some modules, __put_user_1 and others are reported > instead of mcount. nm vmlinux | grep __fentry__ nm vmlinux | grep mcount What do these report ? I bet you that in your vmlinux the first one would return something like :

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/18/2016, 02:27 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > This is the likely problem here. No, it is not. How could a rpm be built with two compilers? Moreover, with some modules, __put_user_1 and others are reported instead of mcount. -- js suse labs

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/18/2016, 02:27 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > This is the likely problem here. No, it is not. How could a rpm be built with two compilers? Moreover, with some modules, __put_user_1 and others are reported instead of mcount. -- js suse labs

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 18.12.2016 13:03, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 18-12-2016 11:49, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 12/18/2016, 12:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: Yes, disk drivers won't load: [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 18.12.2016 13:03, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 18-12-2016 11:49, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 12/18/2016, 12:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: Yes, disk drivers won't load: [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 18-12-2016 11:49, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 12/18/2016, 12:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> >>> Yes, disk drivers won't load: >>> [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of symbol mcount >>> [2.144415]

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 18-12-2016 11:49, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 12/18/2016, 12:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> >>> Yes, disk drivers won't load: >>> [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of symbol mcount >>> [2.144415] virtio_pci: Unknown

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/18/2016, 12:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> >> Yes, disk drivers won't load: >> [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of symbol mcount >> [2.144415] virtio_pci: Unknown symbol mcount (err -22) > > This

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/18/2016, 12:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> >> Yes, disk drivers won't load: >> [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of symbol mcount >> [2.144415] virtio_pci: Unknown symbol mcount (err -22) > > This makes no sense. >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > Yes, disk drivers won't load: > [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of symbol mcount > [2.144415] virtio_pci: Unknown symbol mcount (err -22) This makes no sense. mcount isn't even one of the symbols that

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > Yes, disk drivers won't load: > [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about version of symbol mcount > [2.144415] virtio_pci: Unknown symbol mcount (err -22) This makes no sense. mcount isn't even one of the symbols that the patch by

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:57:47AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 12/16/2016, 08:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> > >> what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. > > > > Did you actually have to

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:57:47AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 12/16/2016, 08:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> > >> what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. > > > > Did you actually have to do that? > >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/16/2016, 08:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> >> what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. > > Did you actually have to do that? Yes, disk drivers won't load: [2.141973] virtio_pci:

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 12/16/2016, 08:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> >> what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. > > Did you actually have to do that? Yes, disk drivers won't load: [2.141973] virtio_pci: disagrees about

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. Did you actually have to do that? Because a missing CRC shouldn't be fatal in 4.9. What was the failure mode? Linus

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. Did you actually have to do that? Because a missing CRC shouldn't be fatal in 4.9. What was the failure mode? Linus

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 10/17/2016, 12:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Anyway, here's my stab at x86: Hi, what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. > From db746df65b920591606398b4b244f5b6dc9eea04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Adam Borowski > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 10/17/2016, 12:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Anyway, here's my stab at x86: Hi, what happened to this? I had to apply this to fix 4.9-pae kernel here. > From db746df65b920591606398b4b244f5b6dc9eea04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Adam Borowski > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:42:35 +0200 >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:48:48PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > > Adam Borowski wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > +#include > +#include > >>> > >>> Included twice. > >> > >> D'oh! This appears to be the only

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:48:48PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > > Adam Borowski wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > +#include > +#include > >>> > >>> Included twice. > >> > >> D'oh! This appears to be the only thing to fix, right?

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 2016-10-18 03:34, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Thanks, this is looking good. powerpc will be able to use the generic > header. > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:26 +0200 > Adam Borowski wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote:

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 2016-10-18 03:34, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Thanks, this is looking good. powerpc will be able to use the generic > header. > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:26 +0200 > Adam Borowski wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: +#include

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 27.10.2016 10:10, Kalle Valo wrote: > (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he > tried to fix something in the same commit) Many thx. I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll watch this thread for further updates on this issue to

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On 27.10.2016 10:10, Kalle Valo wrote: > (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he > tried to fix something in the same commit) Many thx. I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll watch this thread for further updates on this issue to

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:10:03 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he > tried to fix something in the same commit) > > Nicholas Piggin writes: > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 > > Michal

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:10:03 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he > tried to fix something in the same commit) > > Nicholas Piggin writes: > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 > > Michal Marek wrote: > > > >> Dne 18.10.2016 v

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:14:28 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > Nicholas Piggin writes: > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:10:03 +0300 > > Kalle Valo wrote: > > > >> (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he > >>

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:14:28 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > Nicholas Piggin writes: > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:10:03 +0300 > > Kalle Valo wrote: > > > >> (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he > >> tried to fix something in the same commit) > >> > >> Nicholas

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

(Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he tried to fix something in the same commit) Nicholas Piggin writes: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 > Michal Marek wrote: > >> Dne 18.10.2016 v 03:34 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a): >> >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

(Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he tried to fix something in the same commit) Nicholas Piggin writes: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 > Michal Marek wrote: > >> Dne 18.10.2016 v 03:34 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a): >> > We should probably just bring all

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Nicholas Piggin writes: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:10:03 +0300 > Kalle Valo wrote: > >> (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he >> tried to fix something in the same commit) >> >> Nicholas Piggin writes:

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Nicholas Piggin writes: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:10:03 +0300 > Kalle Valo wrote: > >> (Adding Thorsten because of a serious regression and Steven because he >> tried to fix something in the same commit) >> >> Nicholas Piggin writes: >> >> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 >> > Michal

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 18.10.2016 v 03:34 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a): > > We should probably just bring all these arch patches through the > > kbuild tree. > > > > I'm sorry for the breakage: I didn't realize it broke the build with > > some

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:38:14 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 18.10.2016 v 03:34 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a): > > We should probably just bring all these arch patches through the > > kbuild tree. > > > > I'm sorry for the breakage: I didn't realize it broke the build with > > some configs,

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Dne 18.10.2016 v 03:34 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a): > We should probably just bring all these arch patches through the > kbuild tree. > > I'm sorry for the breakage: I didn't realize it broke the build with > some configs, otherwise I would have given Michal a heads up before > his pull request,

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Dne 18.10.2016 v 03:34 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a): > We should probably just bring all these arch patches through the > kbuild tree. > > I'm sorry for the breakage: I didn't realize it broke the build with > some configs, otherwise I would have given Michal a heads up before > his pull request,

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Hi Adam, Thanks, this is looking good. powerpc will be able to use the generic header. On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:26 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > > Included twice.

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Hi Adam, Thanks, this is looking good. powerpc will be able to use the generic header. On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:26 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > > Included twice. > > D'oh! > > > >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > > +#include > > +#include > > Included twice. D'oh! > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > No for __sw_hweight32 and

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > > +#include > > +#include > > Included twice. D'oh! > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > No for __sw_hweight32 and

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

> +#include > +#include Included twice. > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include No for __sw_hweight32 and __sw_hweight64 ?

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

> +#include > +#include Included twice. > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include No for __sw_hweight32 and __sw_hweight64 ?

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Hi Alexey, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 >>> Adam Borowski

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Hi Alexey, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 >>> Adam Borowski wrote: > >> --- /dev/null >> +++

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 >> Adam Borowski wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h > @@ -0,0

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 >> Adam Borowski wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > +#include > +extern void

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 > Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:57:09PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval > >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:59:51PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 > Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:57:09PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval > > > wrote: > > > > So this has broken all

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:57:09PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > > please pull these kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1: > > > > > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL for

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:57:09PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > > please pull these kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1: > > > > > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL for asm source by Al Viro.

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:57:09PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:51:31 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:57:09PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > > > please pull these kbuild

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Hi, >> Reverting 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions") fixes >> it for me. This is with GCC 6.2.1, binutils 2.27, attached config. I've had the same problem. Reverting your binutils from 2.27 to 2.26, will also fix it. It seems ld 2.27 is not merging weak symbols from .o

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

Hi, >> Reverting 784d5699eddc ("x86: move exports to actual definitions") fixes >> it for me. This is with GCC 6.2.1, binutils 2.27, attached config. I've had the same problem. Reverting your binutils from 2.27 to 2.26, will also fix it. It seems ld 2.27 is not merging weak symbols from .o

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > please pull these kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1: > > > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL for asm source by Al Viro. This does bring a regression, > >

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > please pull these kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1: > > > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL for asm source by Al Viro. This does bring a regression, > > because genksyms

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > Hi Linus, > > please pull these kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1: > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL for asm source by Al Viro. This does bring a regression, > because genksyms no longer generates checksums for these symbols > (CONFIG_MODVERSIONS).

Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > Hi Linus, > > please pull these kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1: > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL for asm source by Al Viro. This does bring a regression, > because genksyms no longer generates checksums for these symbols > (CONFIG_MODVERSIONS).