Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-10-31 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:14:57AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Kim, > > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Jaegeuk Kim writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-10-31 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:14:57AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Kim, > > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Jaegeuk Kim writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> >> Hi, Jaegeuk, > >> >> >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-10-30 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Kim, Jaegeuk Kim writes: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> >> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> >> Hi, Jaegeuk, >> >> >> >> "Huang, Ying"

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-10-30 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Kim, Jaegeuk Kim writes: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> >> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> >> Hi, Jaegeuk, >> >> >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> >> >> > Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> >> > >> >> >>

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Hi, Jaegeuk, > >> > >> "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > >> > Jaegeuk Kim

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Hi, Jaegeuk, > >> > >> "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > >> > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > >> > > >> >> Hello, > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Huang, Ying
Jaegeuk Kim writes: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Hi, Jaegeuk, >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> > Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800,

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Huang, Ying
Jaegeuk Kim writes: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Hi, Jaegeuk, >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> > Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> >>> Hi Jaegeuk, >> >>> >> >>> > > >> > -

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > > > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >>> Hi Jaegeuk, > >>> > >>> > >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > > > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >>> Hi Jaegeuk, > >>> > >>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286:

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Jaegeuk, "Huang, Ying" writes: > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>> Hi Jaegeuk, >>> >>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >>> > > >> > >>> >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-09-26 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Jaegeuk, "Huang, Ying" writes: > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>> Hi Jaegeuk, >>> >>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-30 Thread Huang, Ying
Jaegeuk Kim writes: > Hello, > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Hi Jaegeuk, >> >> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> > > >> > >> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-30 Thread Huang, Ying
Jaegeuk Kim writes: > Hello, > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Hi Jaegeuk, >> >> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> > > >> > >> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The >> > > >> >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-29 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hello, On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression > > > >> > > > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The > > > >> > steps for aim7 is, > > > >> > > > >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-29 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hello, On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression > > > >> > > > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The > > > >> > steps for aim7 is, > > > >> > > > >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-26 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi Jaegeuk, >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The >> > steps for aim7 is, >> > >> > cat > workfile <> > FILESIZE: 1M >> > POOLSIZE: 10M >> > 10 sync_disk_rw >> > EOF >> > >> > ( >> >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-26 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi Jaegeuk, >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The >> > steps for aim7 is, >> > >> > cat > workfile <> > FILESIZE: 1M >> > POOLSIZE: 10M >> > 10 sync_disk_rw >> > EOF >> > >> > ( >> >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0700, huang ying wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Hi, Kim, > >> > >> "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> >> >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0700, huang ying wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Hi, Kim, > >> > >> "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> >> > >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee:

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-24 Thread huang ying
Hi, Jaegeuk, On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Hi, Kim, >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression >> >> [lkp]

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-24 Thread huang ying
Hi, Jaegeuk, On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Hi, Kim, >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-11 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Kim, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression > >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression > >> > >> In terms of the above

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-11 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Kim, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression > >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression > >> > >> In terms of the above regression, I could check

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-11 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Kim, "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure >> includes mounting filesystem

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-11 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Kim, "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Huang, Ying
Jaegeuk Kim writes: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> >> > Hi Huang, >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> >> Hi, Jaegeuk, >> >> >> >> "Huang, Ying"

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Huang, Ying
Jaegeuk Kim writes: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Jaegeuk Kim writes: >> >> > Hi Huang, >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> >> Hi, Jaegeuk, >> >> >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I checked the

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > Hi Huang, > > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Hi, Jaegeuk, > >> > >> "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I checked

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Jaegeuk Kim writes: > > > Hi Huang, > > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> Hi, Jaegeuk, > >> > >> "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I checked the comparison result below and found

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Huang, On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > > Hi, > > > > I checked the comparison result below and found this is a regression for > > fsmark.files_per_sec, not fsmark.app_overhead. > > > > Best Regards,

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Huang, On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > > Hi, > > > > I checked the comparison result below and found this is a regression for > > fsmark.files_per_sec, not fsmark.app_overhead. > > > > Best Regards, > > Huang, Ying > > >

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Jaegeuk, "Huang, Ying" writes: > Hi, > > I checked the comparison result below and found this is a regression for > fsmark.files_per_sec, not fsmark.app_overhead. > > Best Regards, > Huang, Ying > > kernel test robot writes: > >> FYI, we noticed

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

2016-08-04 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Jaegeuk, "Huang, Ying" writes: > Hi, > > I checked the comparison result below and found this is a regression for > fsmark.files_per_sec, not fsmark.app_overhead. > > Best Regards, > Huang, Ying > > kernel test robot writes: > >> FYI, we noticed a -36.3% regression of fsmark.files_per_sec