Hi Dave, Ted, All,
On 2014-05-23 16:42:47 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:57:14AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > On 2014-04-29 09:47:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > ping?
> >
> > I'd replied at http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm=139730910307321=2
>
> I
Hi Dave, Ted, All,
On 2014-05-23 16:42:47 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:57:14AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 2014-04-29 09:47:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
ping?
I'd replied at http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=139730910307321w=2
I missed it,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:57:14AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 2014-04-29 09:47:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > ping?
>
> I'd replied at http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm=139730910307321=2
I missed it, sorry.
I've had a bit more time to look at this behaviour now and tweaked
it
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:57:14AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 2014-04-29 09:47:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
ping?
I'd replied at http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=139730910307321w=2
I missed it, sorry.
I've had a bit more time to look at this behaviour now and tweaked
it as
Hi Dave,
On 2014-04-29 09:47:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> ping?
I'd replied at http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm=139730910307321=2
As an additional note:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:20:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I'm not sure how you were generating the behaviour you reported, but
> >
ping?
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:20:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
> > top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another
ping?
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:20:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
Hi Dave,
On 2014-04-29 09:47:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
ping?
I'd replied at http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=139730910307321w=2
As an additional note:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:20:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
I'm not sure how you were generating the behaviour you reported, but
the
(2014/03/28 0:50), Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 26-03-14 22:55:18, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1 concern is
Hello,
On Wed 26-03-14 20:11:13, Andres Freund wrote:
> At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
> top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
> calls fsync(), even though we'd be perfectly fine if that fsync() took
> ages.
> The
On Wed 26-03-14 22:55:18, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
> > > top#1 concern is frequent slow
On Wed 26-03-14 22:55:18, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1 concern is frequent slow
Hello,
On Wed 26-03-14 20:11:13, Andres Freund wrote:
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
calls fsync(), even though we'd be perfectly fine if that fsync() took
ages.
The
(2014/03/28 0:50), Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 26-03-14 22:55:18, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Lang wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
> I'm not sure I understand the request queue stuff, but here's an idea.
> The block core contains this little bit of code:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
I'm not sure I understand the request queue stuff, but here's an idea.
The block core contains this little bit of code:
>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't read enough of the code yet, to comment
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the request queue stuff, but here's an idea.
The block core contains this little bit of code:
I haven't read enough of the code yet, to comment intelligently ;)
My little patch doesn't seem to help. I'm either changing
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
>> > top#1 concern is frequent slow
On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
> > top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
> > calls fsync(),
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
> top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
> calls fsync(), even though we'd be perfectly fine if that fsync() took
> ages.
>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
calls fsync(), even though we'd be perfectly fine if that fsync()
On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1 concern is frequent slow read()s that happen while another process
calls
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-26 14:41:31 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi,
At LSF/MM there was a slot about postgres' problems with the kernel. Our
top#1
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the request queue stuff, but here's an idea.
The block core contains this little bit of code:
I haven't read enough of the code yet, to comment intelligently ;)
My little patch doesn't seem to help. I'm either changing
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the request queue stuff, but here's an idea.
The block core contains this little bit of code:
I haven't read enough of the code yet, to comment
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the request queue stuff, but here's an idea.
The block core contains this little
26 matches
Mail list logo
