On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 12:29 +0200, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 10:49 +0200, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I looked into killing sg_last(), but really, this is the best its gonna
>>> get (moving sg_last to libata-core.c).
>>>
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 10:49 +0200, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I looked into killing sg_last(), but really, this is the best its gonna
get (moving sg_last to libata-core.c).
You could maybe kill one use with caching, but in the other sg_last()
callsites there
On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 10:49 +0200, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked into killing sg_last(), but really, this is the best its gonna
> get (moving sg_last to libata-core.c).
>
> You could maybe kill one use with caching, but in the other sg_last()
> callsites there isn't another
On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 10:49 +0200, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked into killing sg_last(), but really, this is the best its gonna
get (moving sg_last to libata-core.c).
You could maybe kill one use with caching, but in the other sg_last()
callsites there isn't another s/g loop
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 10:49 +0200, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked into killing sg_last(), but really, this is the best its gonna
get (moving sg_last to libata-core.c).
You could maybe kill one use with caching, but in the other sg_last()
callsites there
On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 12:29 +0200, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31 2007 at 10:49 +0200, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked into killing sg_last(), but really, this is the best its gonna
get (moving sg_last to libata-core.c).
You could maybe
6 matches
Mail list logo