On 03/14/2017 08:14 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 14-03-2017 07:24, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> Right, I was forgetting about this ...
>>>
>>> So:
>>> 1) Most of HDMI receivers do not have the expected precision in
>>> measuring pixel clock value;
>> s/Most/Some/
>>
>> Newer HDMI
On 03/14/2017 08:14 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 14-03-2017 07:24, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> Right, I was forgetting about this ...
>>>
>>> So:
>>> 1) Most of HDMI receivers do not have the expected precision in
>>> measuring pixel clock value;
>> s/Most/Some/
>>
>> Newer HDMI
Hi Hans,
On 14-03-2017 07:24, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Right, I was forgetting about this ...
>>
>> So:
>> 1) Most of HDMI receivers do not have the expected precision in
>> measuring pixel clock value;
> s/Most/Some/
>
> Newer HDMI receivers tend to have better precision.
>
> However, the
Hi Hans,
On 14-03-2017 07:24, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Right, I was forgetting about this ...
>>
>> So:
>> 1) Most of HDMI receivers do not have the expected precision in
>> measuring pixel clock value;
> s/Most/Some/
>
> Newer HDMI receivers tend to have better precision.
>
> However, the
On 03/13/2017 08:03 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 09-03-2017 15:40, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 09/03/17 16:15, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
> HDMI
On 03/13/2017 08:03 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 09-03-2017 15:40, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 09/03/17 16:15, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
> HDMI
Hi Hans,
On 09-03-2017 15:40, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 09/03/17 16:15, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>>
>> On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
CEA
Hi Hans,
On 09-03-2017 15:40, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 09/03/17 16:15, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>>
>> On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
CEA
On 09/03/17 16:15, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
>
> On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
>>> CEA specification, can have different frames per second
>>> (fps)
On 09/03/17 16:15, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
>
> On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
>>> CEA specification, can have different frames per second
>>> (fps)
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the review!
On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
>> CEA specification, can have different frames per second
>> (fps) values.
>>
>> This patch introduces a helper function in
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the review!
On 09-03-2017 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
>> CEA specification, can have different frames per second
>> (fps) values.
>>
>> This patch introduces a helper function in
On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
> HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
> CEA specification, can have different frames per second
> (fps) values.
>
> This patch introduces a helper function in the media core
> which can calculate the expected video mode fps given the
> pixel
On 07/03/17 17:48, Jose Abreu wrote:
> HDMI Receivers receive video modes which, according to
> CEA specification, can have different frames per second
> (fps) values.
>
> This patch introduces a helper function in the media core
> which can calculate the expected video mode fps given the
> pixel
14 matches
Mail list logo
